Spectacles with non‑refractive opaque features for paediatric myopia: a safety pilot trial

Optical myopia-control strategies predominantly introduce competing defocus, extend depth of focus, or modify retinal contrast [ 1 ]. A single-vision spectacle lens utilising non-refractive, light-absorbing opaque features to alter spatiotemporal retinal luminance during natural eye movement without defocus, blur, or scatter was developed [ 2 ]. Visual performance in adults was superior to a competing defocus design [ 3 ]. In-vivo myopia efficacy is unknown, and experimental evidence that partial occlusion could potentiate myopiagenesis [ 4 ], underpinning the need for paediatric safety data. A contact-lens counterpart demonstrated safety in a small pilot [ 5 ]; however, spectacle delivery is preferable for younger children. This 14-month, three-phase, within-participant crossover pilot assesses safety (primary) and axial elongation (secondary) in myopic children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eye
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-026-04795-5
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spectacles with non‑refractive opaque features for paediatric myopia: a safety pilot trial

Daniel Tilia, Jennie Diec, Ranjay Chakraborty, Ravi C. Bakaraju et al.
Eye
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Spectacles with non‑refractive opaque features for paediatric myopia: a safety pilot trial

Daniel Tilia, Jennie Diec, Ranjay Chakraborty, Ravi C. Bakaraju, Klaus Ehrmann
article en

Abstract

Optical myopia-control strategies predominantly introduce competing defocus, extend depth of focus, or modify retinal contrast [ 1 ]. A single-vision spectacle lens utilising non-refractive, light-absorbing opaque features to alter spatiotemporal retinal luminance during natural eye movement without defocus, blur, or scatter was developed [ 2 ]. Visual performance in adults was superior to a competing defocus design [ 3 ]. In-vivo myopia efficacy is unknown, and experimental evidence that partial occlusion could potentiate myopiagenesis [ 4 ], underpinning the need for paediatric safety data. A contact-lens counterpart demonstrated safety in a small pilot [ 5 ]; however, spectacle delivery is preferable for younger children. This 14-month, three-phase, within-participant crossover pilot assesses safety (primary) and axial elongation (secondary) in myopic children.

Eye
Flinders University (AU), Australian College of Optometry (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Engeneic (Australia) (AU), Caring Futures Institute (AU)
Flinders University
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Spectacles with non‑refractive opaque features for paediatric myopia: a safety pilot trial — Daniel Tilia, Jennie Diec, et al. · Eye (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS