Comparison of Solvent‐Based and Aqueous‐Enzymatic Extraction Methods of Chia ( <scp> <i>Salvia hispanica</i> </scp> ) Oil: Impacts on Physicochemical Properties and Lipid Nutritional Quality Indices

ABSTRACT Chia oil ( Salvia hispanica L.) is recognized as one of the richest plant sources of ω − 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, but the oil extraction method can influence both its physicochemical characteristics and its nutritional quality, making it essential to select sustainable technologies that maximize health benefits for consumers. The objective of this study was to compare the physicochemical properties, fatty acid composition, and nutritional quality indices of chia oil obtained through conventional solvent extraction and aqueous‐enzymatic extraction. The oil yield and the properties of the extracted lipids were determined using standard analytical methods based on spectrophotometric techniques and gas chromatography. Solvent extraction achieved an oil recovery of 31.72%, significantly higher ( p &lt; 0.05) than the aqueous‐enzymatic process, which recovered only ~9.16%. However, aqueous‐enzymatic extraction resulted in oil with lower acid and peroxide values and a higher iodine value, indicating better preservation of unsaturated lipids. The enzymatically extracted oil contained fewer saturated fatty acids and more polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly α‐linolenic acid. Consequently, it had lower atherogenic and thrombogenic indices, a higher hypocholesterolemic/hypercholesterolemic ratio, and higher health‐promoting and polyene indices than the solvent‐extracted oil while maintaining a similar ω − 3/ ω − 6 ratio. Despite its lower yield, aqueous‐enzymatic extraction is a sustainable technology that delivers chia oil with superior nutritional and potential cardioprotective qualities, positioning it as the preferred choice for functional food and nutraceutical applications if process intensification strategies can be applied to improve its yield to an economically competitive level with respect to conventional solvent extraction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aocs.70146
Primary Topic
Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Solvent‐Based and Aqueous‐Enzymatic Extraction Methods of Chia ( Salvia hispanica ) Oil: Impacts on Physicochemical Properties and Lipid Nutritional Quality Indices

Wilbert Rodríguez‐Canto, David Betancur‐Ancona, Eduardo Castañeda-Pérez, Luis Chel‐Guerrero et al.
Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society
Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
article

Comparison of Solvent‐Based and Aqueous‐Enzymatic Extraction Methods of Chia ( Salvia hispanica ) Oil: Impacts on Physicochemical Properties and Lipid Nutritional Quality Indices

Wilbert Rodríguez‐Canto, David Betancur‐Ancona, Eduardo Castañeda-Pérez, Luis Chel‐Guerrero, Arturo Castellanos-Ruelas
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Chia oil ( Salvia hispanica L.) is recognized as one of the richest plant sources of ω − 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, but the oil extraction method can influence both its physicochemical characteristics and its nutritional quality, making it essential to select sustainable technologies that maximize health benefits for consumers. The objective of this study was to compare the physicochemical properties, fatty acid composition, and nutritional quality indices of chia oil obtained through conventional solvent extraction and aqueous‐enzymatic extraction. The oil yield and the properties of the extracted lipids were determined using standard analytical methods based on spectrophotometric techniques and gas chromatography. Solvent extraction achieved an oil recovery of 31.72%, significantly higher ( p &lt; 0.05) than the aqueous‐enzymatic process, which recovered only ~9.16%. However, aqueous‐enzymatic extraction resulted in oil with lower acid and peroxide values and a higher iodine value, indicating better preservation of unsaturated lipids. The enzymatically extracted oil contained fewer saturated fatty acids and more polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly α‐linolenic acid. Consequently, it had lower atherogenic and thrombogenic indices, a higher hypocholesterolemic/hypercholesterolemic ratio, and higher health‐promoting and polyene indices than the solvent‐extracted oil while maintaining a similar ω − 3/ ω − 6 ratio. Despite its lower yield, aqueous‐enzymatic extraction is a sustainable technology that delivers chia oil with superior nutritional and potential cardioprotective qualities, positioning it as the preferred choice for functional food and nutraceutical applications if process intensification strategies can be applied to improve its yield to an economically competitive level with respect to conventional solvent extraction.

Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society
Autonomous University of Yucatán (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.