Anatomical Localization of Intracranial Electrodes Using Synthetic MRI Generated from Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: MRI and computed tomography (CT) are commonly combined to localize intracranial electrodes in deep brain stimulation (DBS). However, when MRI access is limited or unsafe, only CT may be available, which lacks the soft tissue contrast needed for accurate anatomical reference. SynthSR, a deep learning tool that generates synthetic T1-weighted MRI from CT, may address this limitation. We evaluated the accuracy of SynthSR-based localization compared to standard MRI-CT fusion. METHODS: Preoperative CT, preoperative MRI, and postoperative CT scans were analyzed in 44 patients undergoing subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS for Parkinson's disease (mean age = 60.7 ± 6.9 years; mean disease duration = 10.4 ± 3.9 years). SynthSR generated synthetic T1 scans from preoperative CTs. Post-operative CT was co-registered to synthetic and real MRIs, and electrodes were localized and warped to Montreal Neurological Institute space using either real or synthetic MRI as reference. SynthSR-based localizations were compared to real T1 and T1 + T2 "gold-standard" localizations using 3-dimensional Euclidean and radial distances, as well as anatomical mapping within STN subdivisions. RESULTS: In Montreal Neurological Institute space, the mean radial error between SynthSR- and T1 + T2-based localizations was 1.21 ± 0.77 mm, with a Euclidean distance of 1.67 ± 0.93 mm-comparable to electrode diameter. Roughly 10% of radial errors were >2 mm and 1% were >4 mm. Around 30% of Euclidean distances were >2 mm, and 3% were >4 mm. Anatomical localization concordance was 95.5% for overall STN targeting and 81.8% within STN subdivisions. CONCLUSION: DBS electrode localization using synthetic MRI generated from CT via SynthSR demonstrated preliminary feasibility for DBS electrode localization, although localization differences varied across cases. This CT-only approach may enable postoperative evaluation when MRI is unavailable or contraindicated, supporting broader access to imaging-based DBS analysis as synthetic image generation continues to improve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000004197
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anatomical Localization of Intracranial Electrodes Using Synthetic MRI Generated from Computed Tomography

Andrea A. Kühn, Hargunbir Singh, Bassam Al‐Fatly, Aryan Wadhwa et al.
Neurosurgery
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

Anatomical Localization of Intracranial Electrodes Using Synthetic MRI Generated from Computed Tomography

Andrea A. Kühn, Hargunbir Singh, Bassam Al‐Fatly, Aryan Wadhwa, Rohan Jha, Aaron E. L. Warren, Andreas Horn, Joseph Turner, Juan E. Iglesias, John D. Rolston
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: MRI and computed tomography (CT) are commonly combined to localize intracranial electrodes in deep brain stimulation (DBS). However, when MRI access is limited or unsafe, only CT may be available, which lacks the soft tissue contrast needed for accurate anatomical reference. SynthSR, a deep learning tool that generates synthetic T1-weighted MRI from CT, may address this limitation. We evaluated the accuracy of SynthSR-based localization compared to standard MRI-CT fusion. METHODS: Preoperative CT, preoperative MRI, and postoperative CT scans were analyzed in 44 patients undergoing subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS for Parkinson's disease (mean age = 60.7 ± 6.9 years; mean disease duration = 10.4 ± 3.9 years). SynthSR generated synthetic T1 scans from preoperative CTs. Post-operative CT was co-registered to synthetic and real MRIs, and electrodes were localized and warped to Montreal Neurological Institute space using either real or synthetic MRI as reference. SynthSR-based localizations were compared to real T1 and T1 + T2 "gold-standard" localizations using 3-dimensional Euclidean and radial distances, as well as anatomical mapping within STN subdivisions. RESULTS: In Montreal Neurological Institute space, the mean radial error between SynthSR- and T1 + T2-based localizations was 1.21 ± 0.77 mm, with a Euclidean distance of 1.67 ± 0.93 mm-comparable to electrode diameter. Roughly 10% of radial errors were >2 mm and 1% were >4 mm. Around 30% of Euclidean distances were >2 mm, and 3% were >4 mm. Anatomical localization concordance was 95.5% for overall STN targeting and 81.8% within STN subdivisions. CONCLUSION: DBS electrode localization using synthetic MRI generated from CT via SynthSR demonstrated preliminary feasibility for DBS electrode localization, although localization differences varied across cases. This CT-only approach may enable postoperative evaluation when MRI is unavailable or contraindicated, supporting broader access to imaging-based DBS analysis as synthetic image generation continues to improve.

Neurosurgery
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Circuit Therapeutics (United States) (US), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (US), University Hospital Cologne (DE), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.