Co-designing evaluation criteria for digital technologies in school museum visits: a Delphi-based study

This study presents the 3S Evaluation Framework, which reframes the evaluation of museum digital technologies used with school groups as a form of distributed co-design. Drawing on a four-round Delphi process, museum educators and schoolteachers collaboratively developed evaluative criteria through iterative, anonymous, and feedback-driven dialogue. The process produced 56 validated factors across five facets, which were subsequently interpreted through three interrelated levels: Subjective, Strategic, and Sustainable. The findings suggest that the educational value of museum digital technologies is contingent upon the coordinated interaction of learner experience, pedagogical alignment, and organisational capacity, transcending isolated design features. Methodologically, the study demonstrates how Delphi can function as a distributed co-design process that supports reflexive convergence in multi-stakeholder evaluation. By extending participatory design principles into evaluation and decision-making, the paper contributes a stakeholder-informed interpretive framework for more transparent, context-sensitive, and sustainable digital learning evaluation in museum settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CoDesign
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2026.2714135
Primary Topic
Museums and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-designing evaluation criteria for digital technologies in school museum visits: a Delphi-based study

Giasemi Vavoula, Sheng-Yen Lin
CoDesign
Museums and Cultural Heritage
article

Co-designing evaluation criteria for digital technologies in school museum visits: a Delphi-based study

Giasemi Vavoula, Sheng-Yen Lin
article en

Abstract

This study presents the 3S Evaluation Framework, which reframes the evaluation of museum digital technologies used with school groups as a form of distributed co-design. Drawing on a four-round Delphi process, museum educators and schoolteachers collaboratively developed evaluative criteria through iterative, anonymous, and feedback-driven dialogue. The process produced 56 validated factors across five facets, which were subsequently interpreted through three interrelated levels: Subjective, Strategic, and Sustainable. The findings suggest that the educational value of museum digital technologies is contingent upon the coordinated interaction of learner experience, pedagogical alignment, and organisational capacity, transcending isolated design features. Methodologically, the study demonstrates how Delphi can function as a distributed co-design process that supports reflexive convergence in multi-stakeholder evaluation. By extending participatory design principles into evaluation and decision-making, the paper contributes a stakeholder-informed interpretive framework for more transparent, context-sensitive, and sustainable digital learning evaluation in museum settings.

CoDesign
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), University of Leicester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Museums and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.