On the generalization and usability of cofolding models for GPCR drug discovery

The generalizability of co-folding models for protein-ligand structure prediction remains unclear. Here, we benchmark Boltz, a state-of-the-art co-folding model, using a curated set of ligand-bound human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) from families unseen during training. We show that while Boltz generally predicts receptor backbones accurately, ligand poses can contain significant errors that lead to a limited ability to reproduce experimental affinity data when tested with FEP +. We further show that physics‑based refinement of Boltz models can correct ligand poses to near‑experimental accuracy and rescue FEP+ performance to that of the native structure. These results highlight the strengths and limitations of co-folding methods and motivate a workflow that pairs them with physics-based refinement and validation before high-stakes decisions in drug discovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Drug Discovery.
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44386-026-00066-1
Primary Topic
Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the generalization and usability of cofolding models for GPCR drug discovery

Richard A. Friesner, Lichirui Zhang, Edward B. Miller, João P. GLM Rodrigues
npj Drug Discovery.
Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
article

On the generalization and usability of cofolding models for GPCR drug discovery

Richard A. Friesner, Lichirui Zhang, Edward B. Miller, João P. GLM Rodrigues
article en

Abstract

The generalizability of co-folding models for protein-ligand structure prediction remains unclear. Here, we benchmark Boltz, a state-of-the-art co-folding model, using a curated set of ligand-bound human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) from families unseen during training. We show that while Boltz generally predicts receptor backbones accurately, ligand poses can contain significant errors that lead to a limited ability to reproduce experimental affinity data when tested with FEP +. We further show that physics‑based refinement of Boltz models can correct ligand poses to near‑experimental accuracy and rescue FEP+ performance to that of the native structure. These results highlight the strengths and limitations of co-folding methods and motivate a workflow that pairs them with physics-based refinement and validation before high-stakes decisions in drug discovery.

npj Drug Discovery.Vol. 3(1)
Schrodinger (United States) (US), Columbia University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.