Comparison of Different Upfront Two-Stent Strategies for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: In-Hospital and 6-Month MACE Results

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial for coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs), and over the years, several stent techniques have been developed. Current guidelines on myocardial revascularization recommend an upfront two-stent strategy (U2SS) for complex CBLs. This study was aimed at comparing different upfront two-stenting techniques for true complex CBLs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 142 consecutive patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using an upfront two-stent strategy (DK-crush, mini-culotte, or T/TAP) between June 2019 and September 2022. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, as well as 6-month clinical outcomes, were compared among the three groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and independent predictors of MACE were evaluated using a multivariable Firth penalized logistic regression analysis. Results: Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [a composite of death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization] occurred in 6.3% of the study population at a median follow-up period of 6 months. There were no significant differences in the primary clinical outcomes among the groups. Although the DK-crush group had the lowest observed incidence of MACE, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.137). A multivariable Firth penalized logistic regression analysis identified previous myocardial infarction as the only independent predictor of MACE (adjusted OR: 4.33; 95% CI: 1.10–23.61; p = 0.035). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, all upfront two-stent strategies appeared feasible and were associated with relatively low short-term MACE rates. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed among the evaluated techniques. Previous myocardial infarction was identified as an independent predictor of MACE in the multivariable analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15166308
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Different Upfront Two-Stent Strategies for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: In-Hospital and 6-Month MACE Results

Alparslan Kurtul, Kerim Esenboğa, Mehmet Emre Özerdem, Eralp Tutar et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Comparison of Different Upfront Two-Stent Strategies for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: In-Hospital and 6-Month MACE Results

Alparslan Kurtul, Kerim Esenboğa, Mehmet Emre Özerdem, Eralp Tutar, Yakup Yunus Yamantürk, Halil Gulyigit, Muge Akbulut
article en

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial for coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs), and over the years, several stent techniques have been developed. Current guidelines on myocardial revascularization recommend an upfront two-stent strategy (U2SS) for complex CBLs. This study was aimed at comparing different upfront two-stenting techniques for true complex CBLs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 142 consecutive patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using an upfront two-stent strategy (DK-crush, mini-culotte, or T/TAP) between June 2019 and September 2022. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics, as well as 6-month clinical outcomes, were compared among the three groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and independent predictors of MACE were evaluated using a multivariable Firth penalized logistic regression analysis. Results: Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [a composite of death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization] occurred in 6.3% of the study population at a median follow-up period of 6 months. There were no significant differences in the primary clinical outcomes among the groups. Although the DK-crush group had the lowest observed incidence of MACE, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.137). A multivariable Firth penalized logistic regression analysis identified previous myocardial infarction as the only independent predictor of MACE (adjusted OR: 4.33; 95% CI: 1.10–23.61; p = 0.035). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, all upfront two-stent strategies appeared feasible and were associated with relatively low short-term MACE rates. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed among the evaluated techniques. Previous myocardial infarction was identified as an independent predictor of MACE in the multivariable analysis.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(16)
Ankara University (TR), Mustafa Kemal University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.