Historic and Recent Suicide Risk: Does Causality Orientation Matter?

OBJECTIVE: Low perceived control over suicidal urges has been associated with greater suicide risk. Within Self-Determination Theory, causality orientations are stable motivational drivers shaping beliefs about control over external events. Orientations are three separate but related dimensions varying in levels of perceived agency (autonomous, control, impersonal). This study is believed to be the first to explore relationships between causality orientations and suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). METHODS: = 589) with a lifetime history of STBs. Measures included causality orientation, past-month suicidal ideation, future suicide intent, and lifetime suicidal behaviors. Correlations, logistic, and multiple regressions explored cross-sectional associations between causality orientations and STBs. RESULTS: Low agency (impersonal orientation) was associated with higher past-month suicidal ideation and future suicide intent. Autonomous orientation was associated with greater odds of a lifetime suicide plan. Participants high on both impersonal and autonomous orientations reported higher past-month suicidal ideation and greater likelihood of a past-month suicide attempt. All effect sizes were small. CONCLUSIONS: Causality orientations explain limited variance in lifetime and past-month STBs. Motivational beliefs reflecting futility (impersonal) or conflicted agency (impersonal + autonomous) may contribute modestly to suicidal distress alongside other risk factors. Future studies could examine real-time motivational drivers of STBs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Suicide Research
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2026.2715597
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Historic and Recent Suicide Risk: Does Causality Orientation Matter?

Glenn Melvin, Christopher Rainbow, Ruth Tatnell
Archives of Suicide Research
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Historic and Recent Suicide Risk: Does Causality Orientation Matter?

Glenn Melvin, Christopher Rainbow, Ruth Tatnell
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Low perceived control over suicidal urges has been associated with greater suicide risk. Within Self-Determination Theory, causality orientations are stable motivational drivers shaping beliefs about control over external events. Orientations are three separate but related dimensions varying in levels of perceived agency (autonomous, control, impersonal). This study is believed to be the first to explore relationships between causality orientations and suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). METHODS: = 589) with a lifetime history of STBs. Measures included causality orientation, past-month suicidal ideation, future suicide intent, and lifetime suicidal behaviors. Correlations, logistic, and multiple regressions explored cross-sectional associations between causality orientations and STBs. RESULTS: Low agency (impersonal orientation) was associated with higher past-month suicidal ideation and future suicide intent. Autonomous orientation was associated with greater odds of a lifetime suicide plan. Participants high on both impersonal and autonomous orientations reported higher past-month suicidal ideation and greater likelihood of a past-month suicide attempt. All effect sizes were small. CONCLUSIONS: Causality orientations explain limited variance in lifetime and past-month STBs. Motivational beliefs reflecting futility (impersonal) or conflicted agency (impersonal + autonomous) may contribute modestly to suicidal distress alongside other risk factors. Future studies could examine real-time motivational drivers of STBs.

Archives of Suicide Research
Deakin University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.