The concept ‘build’ in East Caucasian: an intragenetic typology of verbal colexifications

Abstract The paper presents an intragenetic typological investigation of verbal colexifications. Data from 34 languages of the East Caucasian family were collected and analyzed to detect colexifications of the concept ‘build’. By comparing the results of this intragenetic investigation with those of larger cross-linguistic investigations, I show that small-scale, manually compiled and carefully verified databases can contribute to validating and complementing information available from large-scale typological databases. In particular, investigations of under-documented languages allow detecting patterns that, although seemingly rare cross-linguistically, are relatively common at a microtypological level. The colexification patterns attested in my sample can all be explained by well-known metonymic and metaphorical shifts, but only one of them is reported to be cross-linguistically common. While some of the shared patterns could be attributed to a common origin of the verbs in questions, others are likely to have spread by language contact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Folia Linguistica
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2025-0200
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The concept ‘build’ in East Caucasian: an intragenetic typology of verbal colexifications

Chiara Naccarato
Folia Linguistica
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

The concept ‘build’ in East Caucasian: an intragenetic typology of verbal colexifications

Chiara Naccarato
article en

Abstract

Abstract The paper presents an intragenetic typological investigation of verbal colexifications. Data from 34 languages of the East Caucasian family were collected and analyzed to detect colexifications of the concept ‘build’. By comparing the results of this intragenetic investigation with those of larger cross-linguistic investigations, I show that small-scale, manually compiled and carefully verified databases can contribute to validating and complementing information available from large-scale typological databases. In particular, investigations of under-documented languages allow detecting patterns that, although seemingly rare cross-linguistically, are relatively common at a microtypological level. The colexification patterns attested in my sample can all be explained by well-known metonymic and metaphorical shifts, but only one of them is reported to be cross-linguistically common. While some of the shared patterns could be attributed to a common origin of the verbs in questions, others are likely to have spread by language contact.

Folia Linguistica
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Avaya (Bermuda) (BM)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.