Canopy Position and Wind Drive Agrochemical Deposition Across Aerial and Ground-Based Spray Systems in Coffee

Achieving uniform agrochemical deposition in coffee is challenging because canopy structure, terrain, and wind conditions influence spray movement and retention. This study compared an unmanned aerial spray system (UASS), backpack sprayer, and tractor-mounted sprayers across three commercial coffee farms on Hawai‘i Island. Spray coverage, droplet density, droplet size metrics, and operational efficiency were evaluated using water-sensitive cards positioned throughout the canopy and analyzed using mixed-effects models. UASS produced significantly lower spray coverage and droplet density than the ground-based application systems, whereas backpack and tractor sprayers did not differ. Deposition patterns varied with canopy position, with application method effects depending on canopy height, depth, and aspect. Volume median diameter decreased in the upper canopy and with increasing wind speed, while relative span varied modestly among methods and was greater within the canopy interior. Canopy position and wind strongly shaped agrochemical deposition across spray platforms. Although UASS required less field labor and improved accessibility in terrain-limited systems, these operational advantages were accompanied by reduced deposition relative to ground-based sprayers. These findings demonstrate that canopy position and environmental conditions strongly influence agrochemical deposition and support UASS as a complementary application platform rather than a direct replacement for conventional sprayers under the conditions evaluated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AgriEngineering
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering8080336
Primary Topic
Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Canopy Position and Wind Drive Agrochemical Deposition Across Aerial and Ground-Based Spray Systems in Coffee

Roberto Rodríguez, Melissa A. Johnson, Jason Dzurisin, Jared Nishimoto
AgriEngineering
Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
article

Canopy Position and Wind Drive Agrochemical Deposition Across Aerial and Ground-Based Spray Systems in Coffee

Roberto Rodríguez, Melissa A. Johnson, Jason Dzurisin, Jared Nishimoto
article en

Abstract

Achieving uniform agrochemical deposition in coffee is challenging because canopy structure, terrain, and wind conditions influence spray movement and retention. This study compared an unmanned aerial spray system (UASS), backpack sprayer, and tractor-mounted sprayers across three commercial coffee farms on Hawai‘i Island. Spray coverage, droplet density, droplet size metrics, and operational efficiency were evaluated using water-sensitive cards positioned throughout the canopy and analyzed using mixed-effects models. UASS produced significantly lower spray coverage and droplet density than the ground-based application systems, whereas backpack and tractor sprayers did not differ. Deposition patterns varied with canopy position, with application method effects depending on canopy height, depth, and aspect. Volume median diameter decreased in the upper canopy and with increasing wind speed, while relative span varied modestly among methods and was greater within the canopy interior. Canopy position and wind strongly shaped agrochemical deposition across spray platforms. Although UASS required less field labor and improved accessibility in terrain-limited systems, these operational advantages were accompanied by reduced deposition relative to ground-based sprayers. These findings demonstrate that canopy position and environmental conditions strongly influence agrochemical deposition and support UASS as a complementary application platform rather than a direct replacement for conventional sprayers under the conditions evaluated.

AgriEngineeringVol. 8(8)
United States Department of Agriculture (US), University of Hawaii at Hilo (US), Daniel K. Inouye U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center (US), Colorado State University (US)
Agricultural Research Service
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.