Deep Learning in Farming: A Systematic Evidence-Weighted Review of Applications, Validation Gaps, and Emerging Frontiers

This article presents a systematic, evidence-weighted review of Deep Learning (DL) in farming, with a primary emphasis on the agricultural production stage and on four operational domains: precision crop management, precision livestock farming, soil and water resource management, and autonomous agricultural systems. Following a PRISMA 2020-oriented protocol, 56 primary studies (42 with quantitative results) were retained from an initial pool of 18,731 records. The reviewed literature reports applications in plant disease detection, weed recognition, yield prediction, fruit detection, livestock identification and health monitoring, soil-property estimation, crop-water-stress assessment, and robotic perception. High performance on controlled datasets, however, is frequently reported without external, temporal, or cross-site validation, making practical generalisation difficult to establish: in one widely cited benchmark, disease-classification accuracy fell from above 99% on held-out laboratory images to 31.4% on field-acquired images of the same classes. Persistent weaknesses include the limited availability of public benchmarks, inconsistent validation protocols, limited interpretability, fragmented data governance, and insufficient techno-economic analysis. The review argues that the next stage of agricultural AI should be judged less by isolated benchmark scores and more by field realism, reproducibility, deployment maturity, and practical usefulness. Unlike broad surveys that mainly catalogue architectures and applications, this review interprets the literature according to dataset representativeness, validation protocols, benchmarking transparency, deployment realism, and reproducibility, distinguishing algorithmic performance under controlled conditions from practical readiness for real farming environments. The most promising research directions include self-supervised and multimodal learning, explainable and privacy-preserving AI, edge-aware deployment, and hybrid process-informed models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc10080273
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning in Farming: A Systematic Evidence-Weighted Review of Applications, Validation Gaps, and Emerging Frontiers

Lerina Aversano, Vincenzo Dentamaro, Felice Franchini, Vito Domenico Amodio
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Smart Agriculture and AI
article

Deep Learning in Farming: A Systematic Evidence-Weighted Review of Applications, Validation Gaps, and Emerging Frontiers

Lerina Aversano, Vincenzo Dentamaro, Felice Franchini, Vito Domenico Amodio
article en

Abstract

This article presents a systematic, evidence-weighted review of Deep Learning (DL) in farming, with a primary emphasis on the agricultural production stage and on four operational domains: precision crop management, precision livestock farming, soil and water resource management, and autonomous agricultural systems. Following a PRISMA 2020-oriented protocol, 56 primary studies (42 with quantitative results) were retained from an initial pool of 18,731 records. The reviewed literature reports applications in plant disease detection, weed recognition, yield prediction, fruit detection, livestock identification and health monitoring, soil-property estimation, crop-water-stress assessment, and robotic perception. High performance on controlled datasets, however, is frequently reported without external, temporal, or cross-site validation, making practical generalisation difficult to establish: in one widely cited benchmark, disease-classification accuracy fell from above 99% on held-out laboratory images to 31.4% on field-acquired images of the same classes. Persistent weaknesses include the limited availability of public benchmarks, inconsistent validation protocols, limited interpretability, fragmented data governance, and insufficient techno-economic analysis. The review argues that the next stage of agricultural AI should be judged less by isolated benchmark scores and more by field realism, reproducibility, deployment maturity, and practical usefulness. Unlike broad surveys that mainly catalogue architectures and applications, this review interprets the literature according to dataset representativeness, validation protocols, benchmarking transparency, deployment realism, and reproducibility, distinguishing algorithmic performance under controlled conditions from practical readiness for real farming environments. The most promising research directions include self-supervised and multimodal learning, explainable and privacy-preserving AI, edge-aware deployment, and hybrid process-informed models.

Big Data and Cognitive ComputingVol. 10(8)
University of Foggia (IT), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Smart Agriculture and AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.