Representational modelling as ensemble-plus-standing-for. A (weakly) pragmatist account

Abstract The goal of this paper is to present, justify and compare to its rivals an account of representational modelling as ensemble-plus-standing-for. The goal is to provide an analysis that is weak enough to be applied to the plethora of different models in empirical science, but strong enough to offer monistic and substantive answers to the problems of directionality, performance and adequacy of scientific representations. The account combines some inherentist and functional aspects adding some essential pragmatic components. In Sect. 1 I start with some introductory and terminological remarks, and the problems and desiderata the account aims to meet. In Sect. 2, I summarize the main features of inherentist and functional accounts, their virtues worth to preserve and their shortcomings to avoid. In Sect. 3 I present the account and how it answers the three problems. In Sect. 4, I assess the account vis a vis its rivals. In the final section I make some concluding remarks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal for Philosophy of Science
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00759-4
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representational modelling as ensemble-plus-standing-for. A (weakly) pragmatist account

José A. Díez
European Journal for Philosophy of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Representational modelling as ensemble-plus-standing-for. A (weakly) pragmatist account

José A. Díez
article en

Abstract

Abstract The goal of this paper is to present, justify and compare to its rivals an account of representational modelling as ensemble-plus-standing-for. The goal is to provide an analysis that is weak enough to be applied to the plethora of different models in empirical science, but strong enough to offer monistic and substantive answers to the problems of directionality, performance and adequacy of scientific representations. The account combines some inherentist and functional aspects adding some essential pragmatic components. In Sect. 1 I start with some introductory and terminological remarks, and the problems and desiderata the account aims to meet. In Sect. 2, I summarize the main features of inherentist and functional accounts, their virtues worth to preserve and their shortcomings to avoid. In Sect. 3 I present the account and how it answers the three problems. In Sect. 4, I assess the account vis a vis its rivals. In the final section I make some concluding remarks.

European Journal for Philosophy of ScienceVol. 16(3)
Logos Technologies (United States) (US), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Universitat de Barcelona, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.