Chinese authorities’ aspirations for science and technology journals: a bibliometric study based on the High Starting Point New Journal Project of the China Science and Technology Journal Excellence Action Plan

Purpose: This study used journals selected for the High Starting Point New Journal Project as the research sample to systematically compare changes in core development indicators before and after funding and to clarify Chinese authorities’ main journal-development priorities and requirements for newly founded journals.Methods: Journal data were retrieved from the Journal Citation Reports (JCR), Web of Science (WoS), and World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) databases. Wilcoxon signed rank tests with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate corrections were applied to 14 bibliometric indicators.Results: After the funding period, the sample journals showed significant increases in article volume and the number of highly cited papers, indicating expanded publication scale and greater capacity to attract high-quality academic output. The Journal Impact Factor did not change significantly, whereas the average Journal Impact Factor percentile increased significantly; the Journal Citation Indicator showed a nominal increase that did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate correction. The proportion of articles with non-Chinese authors decreased significantly. The number of author-origin countries or regions increased significantly, whereas the number of articles with non-Chinese authors did not change significantly.Conclusion: Chinese authorities’ primary expectation for newly founded journals appears to be that they serve the national scientific innovation system by consolidating their domestic development foundation, increasing their relative disciplinary influence and local service capacity, and then pursuing gradual, high-quality internationalization through steady expansion of global reach after stronger local development has been established. These findings provide empirical evidence that global publishers can use to refine development strategies for the Chinese market and that government agencies and academic organizations can use when launching new journals and designing supporting funding policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Editing
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.412
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chinese authorities’ aspirations for science and technology journals: a bibliometric study based on the High Starting Point New Journal Project of the China Science and Technology Journal Excellence Action Plan

Lijuan Zhan, Xuhao Sun, Miaoqi ZHANG
Science Editing
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Chinese authorities’ aspirations for science and technology journals: a bibliometric study based on the High Starting Point New Journal Project of the China Science and Technology Journal Excellence Action Plan

Lijuan Zhan, Xuhao Sun, Miaoqi ZHANG
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study used journals selected for the High Starting Point New Journal Project as the research sample to systematically compare changes in core development indicators before and after funding and to clarify Chinese authorities’ main journal-development priorities and requirements for newly founded journals.Methods: Journal data were retrieved from the Journal Citation Reports (JCR), Web of Science (WoS), and World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) databases. Wilcoxon signed rank tests with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate corrections were applied to 14 bibliometric indicators.Results: After the funding period, the sample journals showed significant increases in article volume and the number of highly cited papers, indicating expanded publication scale and greater capacity to attract high-quality academic output. The Journal Impact Factor did not change significantly, whereas the average Journal Impact Factor percentile increased significantly; the Journal Citation Indicator showed a nominal increase that did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate correction. The proportion of articles with non-Chinese authors decreased significantly. The number of author-origin countries or regions increased significantly, whereas the number of articles with non-Chinese authors did not change significantly.Conclusion: Chinese authorities’ primary expectation for newly founded journals appears to be that they serve the national scientific innovation system by consolidating their domestic development foundation, increasing their relative disciplinary influence and local service capacity, and then pursuing gradual, high-quality internationalization through steady expansion of global reach after stronger local development has been established. These findings provide empirical evidence that global publishers can use to refine development strategies for the Chinese market and that government agencies and academic organizations can use when launching new journals and designing supporting funding policies.

Science EditingVol. 13(2)
Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.