Life Cycle Assessment of Hay Versus Haylage in a Mediterranean Forage System: A Sicilian Case Study

Forage conservation is a strategic component of Mediterranean livestock systems, where seasonal drought, irregular rainfall, and high summer temperatures limit the availability of fresh forage. In these environments, hay and haylage are widely used as preservation strategies, yet their environmental performance remains insufficiently quantified under semi-arid conditions. It is hypothesized that the higher material and energy inputs required for haylage could be compensated for by the combined effects of biomass preservation efficiency and forage productivity, resulting in comparable or lower impacts per unit of conserved forage under Mediterranean farm conditions. To test this hypothesis, a life cycle assessment was conducted to compare hay and haylage production in a forage farm located in Sicily, Italy, considering the 2024–2025 season. The analysis adopted a cradle-to-farm-gate system boundary, and two complementary impact assessment methods, namely the CML-IA baseline method and the ReCiPe 2016 method, were applied. Environmental burdens were calculated per hectare of cultivated land and per ton of dry matter produced to capture both land-based and product-based performance. The choice of functional unit strongly influenced the interpretation of the environmental impact results. Per hectare, hay and haylage displayed comparable overall burdens, with haylage showing higher impacts in impact categories linked to plastic use and wrapping operations. Per ton of dry matter, however, haylage showed consistently lower impacts, attributed to greater biomass recovery and higher dry matter output, reflecting the combined effect of forage composition, crop productivity, and conservation efficiency. Hay systems showed greater burdens per unit of product under the evaluated farm conditions due to prolonged drying periods, repeated field operations, and higher biomass losses during harvesting and storage. The results suggest that, within the specific Mediterranean farm context analyzed, the combined effects of biomass preservation efficiency and crop productivity were important factors influencing environmental performance when impacts were expressed on an output basis. This case study contributes to current knowledge by identifying biomass recovery, rather than input minimization alone, as a key driver of sustainable forage conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16161558
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life Cycle Assessment of Hay Versus Haylage in a Mediterranean Forage System: A Sicilian Case Study

Giuseppe Di Miceli, Micol Auteri, Davide Farruggia, Simona Prestigiacomo
Agronomy
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Life Cycle Assessment of Hay Versus Haylage in a Mediterranean Forage System: A Sicilian Case Study

Giuseppe Di Miceli, Micol Auteri, Davide Farruggia, Simona Prestigiacomo
article en

Abstract

Forage conservation is a strategic component of Mediterranean livestock systems, where seasonal drought, irregular rainfall, and high summer temperatures limit the availability of fresh forage. In these environments, hay and haylage are widely used as preservation strategies, yet their environmental performance remains insufficiently quantified under semi-arid conditions. It is hypothesized that the higher material and energy inputs required for haylage could be compensated for by the combined effects of biomass preservation efficiency and forage productivity, resulting in comparable or lower impacts per unit of conserved forage under Mediterranean farm conditions. To test this hypothesis, a life cycle assessment was conducted to compare hay and haylage production in a forage farm located in Sicily, Italy, considering the 2024–2025 season. The analysis adopted a cradle-to-farm-gate system boundary, and two complementary impact assessment methods, namely the CML-IA baseline method and the ReCiPe 2016 method, were applied. Environmental burdens were calculated per hectare of cultivated land and per ton of dry matter produced to capture both land-based and product-based performance. The choice of functional unit strongly influenced the interpretation of the environmental impact results. Per hectare, hay and haylage displayed comparable overall burdens, with haylage showing higher impacts in impact categories linked to plastic use and wrapping operations. Per ton of dry matter, however, haylage showed consistently lower impacts, attributed to greater biomass recovery and higher dry matter output, reflecting the combined effect of forage composition, crop productivity, and conservation efficiency. Hay systems showed greater burdens per unit of product under the evaluated farm conditions due to prolonged drying periods, repeated field operations, and higher biomass losses during harvesting and storage. The results suggest that, within the specific Mediterranean farm context analyzed, the combined effects of biomass preservation efficiency and crop productivity were important factors influencing environmental performance when impacts were expressed on an output basis. This case study contributes to current knowledge by identifying biomass recovery, rather than input minimization alone, as a key driver of sustainable forage conservation.

AgronomyVol. 16(16)
Innovative Research (United States) (US), University of Palermo (IT)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.