The ‘Other’ face of health security: Reimagining epistemic attachments in global health

The 'health security' paradigm has reshaped global health since Covid-19, framing infectious diseases as existential threats and targeting marginalised populations as risky 'others' to surveil and contain. However, its exclusionary consequences for those 'othered' remain underexamined, particularly from the perspective of lived experience. Drawing on ethnographic and archival case studies in Lebanon, Nepal, Serbia, and Syria (2021-2025), we examine health security's 'other' face, the systematic exclusion of migrant, rural, and displaced populations from protection, ranging from vaccine apartheid to medicalised border controls. We argue that these are not abstract harms but embodied burdens, and that ethnographic perspectives are essential to reveal them. Rejecting the premise that securitisation as the only available logic, we propose five cooperative mechanisms, including demilitarised financing, a binding vaccine convention, and data sovereignty, to shift global health toward equity and care. The question is not whether we can imagine different futures, but whether we have the courage to build them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007105
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ‘Other’ face of health security: Reimagining epistemic attachments in global health

Natasha Howard, Charnele Nunes, Majd Saleh, Anna Durrance‐Bagale et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Global Security and Public Health
article

The ‘Other’ face of health security: Reimagining epistemic attachments in global health

Natasha Howard, Charnele Nunes, Majd Saleh, Anna Durrance‐Bagale, Mervat Alhaffar, Esther Sharma, Max D. López Toledano, Ali Alshalah
article en

Abstract

The 'health security' paradigm has reshaped global health since Covid-19, framing infectious diseases as existential threats and targeting marginalised populations as risky 'others' to surveil and contain. However, its exclusionary consequences for those 'othered' remain underexamined, particularly from the perspective of lived experience. Drawing on ethnographic and archival case studies in Lebanon, Nepal, Serbia, and Syria (2021-2025), we examine health security's 'other' face, the systematic exclusion of migrant, rural, and displaced populations from protection, ranging from vaccine apartheid to medicalised border controls. We argue that these are not abstract harms but embodied burdens, and that ethnographic perspectives are essential to reveal them. Rejecting the premise that securitisation as the only available logic, we propose five cooperative mechanisms, including demilitarised financing, a binding vaccine convention, and data sovereignty, to shift global health toward equity and care. The question is not whether we can imagine different futures, but whether we have the courage to build them.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(8)
National University of Singapore (SG), King's College London (GB), Baghdad Medical City (IQ), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), National University Health System (SG)
Ministry of Education - Singapore
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.