The Apgar Score in Foals: Association with Clinical, Behavioral and Reproductive Parameters

The Apgar score is commonly used to assess neonatal vitality in foals, although its clinical relevance remains unclear. This retrospective study evaluated 144 foals investigating associations between a four-parameter Apgar score assessed within 5 min of birth as well as selected neonatal and maternal variables. Inclusion criteria required availability of Apgar scores and body temperature measurements. Maternal, reproductive, and peripartum determinants were evaluated using ordinal logistic regression. Spearman’s rank correlation, Kruskal–Wallis analysis, and Fisher’s exact test were applied as appropriate according to type and distribution. Multiple comparisons were controlled using the Benjamini–Hochberg false-discovery-rate procedure. Most foals showed good neonatal vitality (median Apgar score 8/8, IQR 7–8; 91.7% had scores ≥ 7/8). Higher Apgar scores were associated with higher heart rate, respiratory rate, and shorter time to sternal recumbency, therefore supporting the score’s internal consistency. No associations were found with neonatal behavioral milestones, blood glucose, IgG concentrations, or maternal and reproductive variables. Umbilical abnormalities were not associated with low Apgar score after multiple-comparisons correction. However, few foals scored ≤ 6/8, which limited the evaluation of clinically compromised neonates. Overall, the Apgar score appears to be a practical tool for evaluating immediate neonatal vitality in foals. However, the associations with subsequent neonatal and maternal variables were limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16162536
Primary Topic
Veterinary Equine Medical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Apgar Score in Foals: Association with Clinical, Behavioral and Reproductive Parameters

Micaela Sgorbini, Giulia Sala, Maria Claudia Curadi, Giorgia Troiani et al.
Animals
Veterinary Equine Medical Research
article

The Apgar Score in Foals: Association with Clinical, Behavioral and Reproductive Parameters

Micaela Sgorbini, Giulia Sala, Maria Claudia Curadi, Giorgia Troiani, D. Cingottini, Paola Marmorini, Alessandra Bulgarella
article en

Abstract

The Apgar score is commonly used to assess neonatal vitality in foals, although its clinical relevance remains unclear. This retrospective study evaluated 144 foals investigating associations between a four-parameter Apgar score assessed within 5 min of birth as well as selected neonatal and maternal variables. Inclusion criteria required availability of Apgar scores and body temperature measurements. Maternal, reproductive, and peripartum determinants were evaluated using ordinal logistic regression. Spearman’s rank correlation, Kruskal–Wallis analysis, and Fisher’s exact test were applied as appropriate according to type and distribution. Multiple comparisons were controlled using the Benjamini–Hochberg false-discovery-rate procedure. Most foals showed good neonatal vitality (median Apgar score 8/8, IQR 7–8; 91.7% had scores ≥ 7/8). Higher Apgar scores were associated with higher heart rate, respiratory rate, and shorter time to sternal recumbency, therefore supporting the score’s internal consistency. No associations were found with neonatal behavioral milestones, blood glucose, IgG concentrations, or maternal and reproductive variables. Umbilical abnormalities were not associated with low Apgar score after multiple-comparisons correction. However, few foals scored ≤ 6/8, which limited the evaluation of clinically compromised neonates. Overall, the Apgar score appears to be a practical tool for evaluating immediate neonatal vitality in foals. However, the associations with subsequent neonatal and maternal variables were limited.

AnimalsVol. 16(16)
University of Pisa (IT), University of Milan (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Veterinary Equine Medical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.