Test the way we teach: the need for bilingual approaches to data-driven practices

This qualitative study explores how three bilingual teachers in a transitional bilingual education program navigate monolingual assessment policies and practices in a high-stakes accountability context. Using a vertical case study design and a figured worlds theoretical framework, the research explores how educators reconcile district-mandated, English-centric data-driven instruction (DDI) practices with the linguistic realities of their bilingual students. Findings reveal that DDI structures and monolingual assessments perpetuate English hegemony and marginalize bilingual students and teachers, though teachers can play an agentive role in strategically navigating and resisting those structures. The study underscores the urgent need for systemic shifts in assessment and accountability policies to support authentic bilingual education – calling for context-specific policy design that centers bilingualism and aligns instructional and assessment resources with the lived experiences of bilingual learners and educators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NABE Journal of Research and Practice
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26390043.2026.2706111
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test the way we teach: the need for bilingual approaches to data-driven practices

Deena Gumina
NABE Journal of Research and Practice
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

Test the way we teach: the need for bilingual approaches to data-driven practices

Deena Gumina
article en

Abstract

This qualitative study explores how three bilingual teachers in a transitional bilingual education program navigate monolingual assessment policies and practices in a high-stakes accountability context. Using a vertical case study design and a figured worlds theoretical framework, the research explores how educators reconcile district-mandated, English-centric data-driven instruction (DDI) practices with the linguistic realities of their bilingual students. Findings reveal that DDI structures and monolingual assessments perpetuate English hegemony and marginalize bilingual students and teachers, though teachers can play an agentive role in strategically navigating and resisting those structures. The study underscores the urgent need for systemic shifts in assessment and accountability policies to support authentic bilingual education – calling for context-specific policy design that centers bilingualism and aligns instructional and assessment resources with the lived experiences of bilingual learners and educators.

NABE Journal of Research and Practice
University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Colorado System (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Test the way we teach: the need for bilingual approaches to data-driven practices — Deena Gumina · NABE Journal of Research and Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS