Time-dependent prognostic impact of tumor grade in stage I-III breast cancers

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) mortality risk extends over decades; yet, the temporal prognostic patterns of histological grade across subtypes and stages remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stage I-III BC diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries (N = 767 218). Breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM), as the primary endpoint, was analyzed using cumulative incidence functions including competing risk and annual hazard rates stratified by grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Restricted mean survival time differences were calculated to quantify absolute survival differences across follow-up intervals. Landmark survival analyses were carried out for 0 to <60, 60 to <120, and 120 to <180 months from diagnosis. Time-varying effects of grade were assessed through interval-specific modeling to evaluate nonproportional hazards. RESULTS: Overall, 23%, 44%, and 33% of cancers were grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively, accounting for 8%, 35%, and 57% of BC deaths. In each consecutive follow-up period, the contribution of grade 1 cancers to BCSM increased, and the contribution of grade 3 cancers decreased. Overall, 59% and 30% of deaths from grades 1 and 3 cancers, respectively, occurred after 5 years. In ER-positive disease, grade 3 tumors showed peak annual hazards between years 3 and 5, whereas grade 1 tumors had lower but sustained hazards extending beyond 10 years; the hazard curves converged between years 10 and 12. In ER-negative disease, early hazards were higher, and convergence also started earlier at years 5-8. Absolute risk was influenced by nodal status and tumor stage within each grade category and follow-up interval. CONCLUSION: Grade 1 cancers show sustained risk beyond 10 years, whereas grade 3 cancers exhibit front-loaded risk. These temporal risk patterns, together with other clinical and genomic data, could inform extended endocrine therapy decisions and surveillance strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ESMO Open
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.108352
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time-dependent prognostic impact of tumor grade in stage I-III breast cancers

Lajos Pusztai, Giampaolo Bianchini, Michał Marczyk, Marco Mariani et al.
ESMO Open
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Time-dependent prognostic impact of tumor grade in stage I-III breast cancers

Lajos Pusztai, Giampaolo Bianchini, Michał Marczyk, Marco Mariani, M. Ochocki
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) mortality risk extends over decades; yet, the temporal prognostic patterns of histological grade across subtypes and stages remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stage I-III BC diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries (N = 767 218). Breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM), as the primary endpoint, was analyzed using cumulative incidence functions including competing risk and annual hazard rates stratified by grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Restricted mean survival time differences were calculated to quantify absolute survival differences across follow-up intervals. Landmark survival analyses were carried out for 0 to <60, 60 to <120, and 120 to <180 months from diagnosis. Time-varying effects of grade were assessed through interval-specific modeling to evaluate nonproportional hazards. RESULTS: Overall, 23%, 44%, and 33% of cancers were grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively, accounting for 8%, 35%, and 57% of BC deaths. In each consecutive follow-up period, the contribution of grade 1 cancers to BCSM increased, and the contribution of grade 3 cancers decreased. Overall, 59% and 30% of deaths from grades 1 and 3 cancers, respectively, occurred after 5 years. In ER-positive disease, grade 3 tumors showed peak annual hazards between years 3 and 5, whereas grade 1 tumors had lower but sustained hazards extending beyond 10 years; the hazard curves converged between years 10 and 12. In ER-negative disease, early hazards were higher, and convergence also started earlier at years 5-8. Absolute risk was influenced by nodal status and tumor stage within each grade category and follow-up interval. CONCLUSION: Grade 1 cancers show sustained risk beyond 10 years, whereas grade 3 cancers exhibit front-loaded risk. These temporal risk patterns, together with other clinical and genomic data, could inform extended endocrine therapy decisions and surveillance strategies.

ESMO OpenVol. 11(9)
Silesian University of Technology (PL), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Yale Cancer Center (US), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
Breast Cancer Research Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.