DNA Groove Ratios: Golden Ratio Claim Unsupported by Crystallographic Data — E8 Intelligence Research

FINDING: DNA major and minor groove widths approximate the golden ratio (1.618) in their proportional relationship. | MATH: Major groove width ≈ 22 Å, minor groove width ≈ 12 Å; ratio 22/12 ≈ 1.833 (not 1.618). However, refined measurements from B-DNA crystallography give major groove width ~11.7 Å, minor groove ~5.7 Å; ratio 11.7/5.7 ≈ 2.053. The golden ratio appears in the ratio of the sum of widths to the major groove: (11.7+5.7)/11.7 ≈ 1.487, or to the minor: (11.7+5.7)/5.7 ≈ 3.053. No exact 1.618 emerges from standard groove widths. | CONNECTION: The golden ratio (φ = 1.618) is not directly supported by these measurements. However, the ratio of the helical rise per base pair (3.4 Å) to the diameter (20 Å) gives 20/3.4 ≈ 5.882, unrelated. The 0.618 reciprocal appears if one considers minor/major = 5.7/11.7 ≈ 0.487. No clean φ link. | DEPTH: 2 — The claim is popular but unsupported by precise data. The groove widths do not yield φ or its reciprocal. The evidence shows approximate ra Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21929059
Primary Topic
Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

DNA Groove Ratios: Golden Ratio Claim Unsupported by Crystallographic Data — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
preprint

DNA Groove Ratios: Golden Ratio Claim Unsupported by Crystallographic Data — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
preprint en

Abstract

FINDING: DNA major and minor groove widths approximate the golden ratio (1.618) in their proportional relationship. | MATH: Major groove width ≈ 22 Å, minor groove width ≈ 12 Å; ratio 22/12 ≈ 1.833 (not 1.618). However, refined measurements from B-DNA crystallography give major groove width ~11.7 Å, minor groove ~5.7 Å; ratio 11.7/5.7 ≈ 2.053. The golden ratio appears in the ratio of the sum of widths to the major groove: (11.7+5.7)/11.7 ≈ 1.487, or to the minor: (11.7+5.7)/5.7 ≈ 3.053. No exact 1.618 emerges from standard groove widths. | CONNECTION: The golden ratio (φ = 1.618) is not directly supported by these measurements. However, the ratio of the helical rise per base pair (3.4 Å) to the diameter (20 Å) gives 20/3.4 ≈ 5.882, unrelated. The 0.618 reciprocal appears if one considers minor/major = 5.7/11.7 ≈ 0.487. No clean φ link. | DEPTH: 2 — The claim is popular but unsupported by precise data. The groove widths do not yield φ or its reciprocal. The evidence shows approximate ra Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DNA Groove Ratios: Golden Ratio Claim Unsupported by Crystallographic Data — E8 Intelligence Research — Andrew Stewart Caldin · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS