Beyond the Surface: Identifying Ethical Blind Spots in the Development of Locator Devices for Dementia Care

Locator devices, also known as electronic tracking, monitoring, or surveillance devices, are increasingly being adopted in various care settings to help manage dementia-related wandering and bolster the safety and autonomy of persons with dementia. Their use in dementia-care has raised ethical concerns. While the primary focus of this concern has centered on the use of locator devices, there is a steadily growing call to better integrate ethical reflection into the development phase of these technologies. Many ethical tensions are present during the development of a locator device, and stakeholder inclusion, inclusive of persons with dementia, is a key method to navigating them. However, due to current limitations in dementia inclusive development, stakeholder inclusion alone is insufficient to fully engage with the ethical dimensions of locator device development. In this article, we aim to support more effective stakeholder inclusion by identifying underrepresented elements of the current normative debate and translating them into ethical considerations that can be used throughout the development process. We do this by applying the Leuven Ethical Question Framework for the evaluation of health technology innovations. Using the Framework as a tool for reflection, we identify six ethical considerations present at the individual-relational, organizational, societal, and global socio-historical contexts. These considerations can help integrate ethical reflection into the development process by providing developers with an initial scaffold for dialogue, both with stakeholders and within their own teams, and also serve as starting points for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Engineering Ethics
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-026-00599-8
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Surface: Identifying Ethical Blind Spots in the Development of Locator Devices for Dementia Care

Yvonne Denier, Jared Howes, Chris Gastmans, Tijs Vandemeulebroucke
Science and Engineering Ethics
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

Beyond the Surface: Identifying Ethical Blind Spots in the Development of Locator Devices for Dementia Care

Yvonne Denier, Jared Howes, Chris Gastmans, Tijs Vandemeulebroucke
article en

Abstract

Locator devices, also known as electronic tracking, monitoring, or surveillance devices, are increasingly being adopted in various care settings to help manage dementia-related wandering and bolster the safety and autonomy of persons with dementia. Their use in dementia-care has raised ethical concerns. While the primary focus of this concern has centered on the use of locator devices, there is a steadily growing call to better integrate ethical reflection into the development phase of these technologies. Many ethical tensions are present during the development of a locator device, and stakeholder inclusion, inclusive of persons with dementia, is a key method to navigating them. However, due to current limitations in dementia inclusive development, stakeholder inclusion alone is insufficient to fully engage with the ethical dimensions of locator device development. In this article, we aim to support more effective stakeholder inclusion by identifying underrepresented elements of the current normative debate and translating them into ethical considerations that can be used throughout the development process. We do this by applying the Leuven Ethical Question Framework for the evaluation of health technology innovations. Using the Framework as a tool for reflection, we identify six ethical considerations present at the individual-relational, organizational, societal, and global socio-historical contexts. These considerations can help integrate ethical reflection into the development process by providing developers with an initial scaffold for dialogue, both with stakeholders and within their own teams, and also serve as starting points for future research.

Science and Engineering Ethics
KU Leuven (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond the Surface: Identifying Ethical Blind Spots in the Development of Locator Devices for Dementia Care — Yvonne Denier, Jared Howes, et al. · Science and Engineering Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS