Participatory Scientific Assessment and Academic Peer Review Management An Operational and Institutional Framework for Decentralized, Sustainable Academic Publishing and Evaluation Compliant with International Standards (DORA, CoARA, UNESCO, RI2)

Abstract This document aims to end academic reliance on monopolistic models based on misleading impact factors by presenting a well-studied framework for launching a "Participatory Community Scientific Review Platform." This shifts cognitive authority from the individual editor to dynamically forming specialized scientific communities and ensures transparent, responsible pre-publication peer review. This framework has undergone a multi-axis critical review cycle, encompassing the statistical coherence of decision rules, cold-start mechanisms for reference databases, procedural governance guarantees, and the realism of legislative integration with the university environment globally. The current formulation reflects the addressing of all these axes with full methodological transparency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21937743
Primary Topic
Academic Publishing and Open Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participatory Scientific Assessment and Academic Peer Review Management An Operational and Institutional Framework for Decentralized, Sustainable Academic Publishing and Evaluation Compliant with International Standards (DORA, CoARA, UNESCO, RI2)

muhammad.munshad falih
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Academic Publishing and Open Access
article

Participatory Scientific Assessment and Academic Peer Review Management An Operational and Institutional Framework for Decentralized, Sustainable Academic Publishing and Evaluation Compliant with International Standards (DORA, CoARA, UNESCO, RI2)

muhammad.munshad falih
article en

Abstract

Abstract This document aims to end academic reliance on monopolistic models based on misleading impact factors by presenting a well-studied framework for launching a "Participatory Community Scientific Review Platform." This shifts cognitive authority from the individual editor to dynamically forming specialized scientific communities and ensures transparent, responsible pre-publication peer review. This framework has undergone a multi-axis critical review cycle, encompassing the statistical coherence of decision rules, cold-start mechanisms for reference databases, procedural governance guarantees, and the realism of legislative integration with the university environment globally. The current formulation reflects the addressing of all these axes with full methodological transparency.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Diyala (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Academic Publishing and Open Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.