Social validity as an interactive process

Social validity in applied behavior analysis remains critically important. However, assessing social validity and responding to its results pose challenges for the field. Social validity assessments are often treated as a one-time measure conducted after intervention. Researchers have urged consideration of social validity as an ongoing, dynamic, and interactive process (i.e., interventions are adjusted based on social validity assessment results). Yet, there has been limited discussion on the interactive process of social validity and the variables that may influence it. This article (a) reviews definitions of social validity and the purpose of its assessment; (b) examines how studies published in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis from 2010 to 2020 have assessed social validity as an interactive process; and (c) offers considerations for researchers and practitioners to enhance opportunities for an interactive process of social validity, including issues related to the measurement rigor and data interpretability of social validity assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.70079
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social validity as an interactive process

Tina M. Sidener, Heather Pane, Sharon A. Reeve, Nicole M. Rodriguez et al.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Social validity as an interactive process

Tina M. Sidener, Heather Pane, Sharon A. Reeve, Nicole M. Rodriguez, Toni Rose T. Agana, Onada Pauline Macaraeg
article en

Abstract

Social validity in applied behavior analysis remains critically important. However, assessing social validity and responding to its results pose challenges for the field. Social validity assessments are often treated as a one-time measure conducted after intervention. Researchers have urged consideration of social validity as an ongoing, dynamic, and interactive process (i.e., interventions are adjusted based on social validity assessment results). Yet, there has been limited discussion on the interactive process of social validity and the variables that may influence it. This article (a) reviews definitions of social validity and the purpose of its assessment; (b) examines how studies published in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis from 2010 to 2020 have assessed social validity as an interactive process; and (c) offers considerations for researchers and practitioners to enhance opportunities for an interactive process of social validity, including issues related to the measurement rigor and data interpretability of social validity assessments.

Journal of Applied Behavior AnalysisVol. 59(4)
Nebraska Medical Center (US), Daemen College (US), AYR (United Kingdom) (GB), Caldwell University (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social validity as an interactive process — Tina M. Sidener, Heather Pane, et al. · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS