From Automation to Agency: Distributed Algorithmic Authority in Physical AI-Enabled Warehouse Execution Systems

(1) Background: Physical artificial intelligence is progressing beyond performing tasks. As embodied AI systems integrate sensing, context-sensitive inference, orchestration, and physical actuation, the central issue shifts from automation efficiency to the redistribution of decision authority within organizational execution. (2) Methods: This paper develops a conceptual systems framework through structured, problem-centered conceptual theorizing. It integrates organizational information processing theory, requisite-variety and viable-system reasoning, near-decomposability and interactive-complexity perspectives, human-factors research, organizational authority, and socio-technical systems theory. (3) Results: The framework conceptualizes physical AI as a facility-level socio-technical execution architecture and introduces distributed algorithmic authority (DAA) as the degree to which real operational decision authority is distributed across interacting human, algorithmic, and embodied components. DAA comprises four dimensions: the scope of delegated decision rights, the locus and distribution of authority, revocability and intervention rights, and decision legibility. The framework distinguishes DAA intensity from DAA controllability and proposes an inverted-U relationship between DAA intensity and facility-level system performance. Greater DAA intensity can improve local responsiveness while eventually reducing coordination coherence and corrective control when the variety of distributed decisions exceeds the architecture’s coordinating capacity. DAA controllability and system-level control capacity—comprising governance maturity, coordinating variety, intervention capacity, and data integrity—shift the viable threshold of distributed authority. (4) Conclusions: Physical AI should be understood not simply as an automation capability, but as a socio-technical reconfiguration of execution and control whose effects depend on whether distributed operational authority remains legible, revocable, and governable at the system level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14080995
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Automation to Agency: Distributed Algorithmic Authority in Physical AI-Enabled Warehouse Execution Systems

Klavdij Logožar
Systems
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

From Automation to Agency: Distributed Algorithmic Authority in Physical AI-Enabled Warehouse Execution Systems

Klavdij Logožar
article en

Abstract

(1) Background: Physical artificial intelligence is progressing beyond performing tasks. As embodied AI systems integrate sensing, context-sensitive inference, orchestration, and physical actuation, the central issue shifts from automation efficiency to the redistribution of decision authority within organizational execution. (2) Methods: This paper develops a conceptual systems framework through structured, problem-centered conceptual theorizing. It integrates organizational information processing theory, requisite-variety and viable-system reasoning, near-decomposability and interactive-complexity perspectives, human-factors research, organizational authority, and socio-technical systems theory. (3) Results: The framework conceptualizes physical AI as a facility-level socio-technical execution architecture and introduces distributed algorithmic authority (DAA) as the degree to which real operational decision authority is distributed across interacting human, algorithmic, and embodied components. DAA comprises four dimensions: the scope of delegated decision rights, the locus and distribution of authority, revocability and intervention rights, and decision legibility. The framework distinguishes DAA intensity from DAA controllability and proposes an inverted-U relationship between DAA intensity and facility-level system performance. Greater DAA intensity can improve local responsiveness while eventually reducing coordination coherence and corrective control when the variety of distributed decisions exceeds the architecture’s coordinating capacity. DAA controllability and system-level control capacity—comprising governance maturity, coordinating variety, intervention capacity, and data integrity—shift the viable threshold of distributed authority. (4) Conclusions: Physical AI should be understood not simply as an automation capability, but as a socio-technical reconfiguration of execution and control whose effects depend on whether distributed operational authority remains legible, revocable, and governable at the system level.

SystemsVol. 14(8)
University of Maribor (SI)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Automation to Agency: Distributed Algorithmic Authority in Physical AI-Enabled Warehouse Execution Systems — Klavdij Logožar · Systems (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS