Flow cytometric phytoplankton concentration and optical properties across instruments and laboratories

Abstract Flow cytometry measures the optical properties of individual cells and has become essential for enumerating and characterizing marine phytoplankton. Yet systematic comparison of measurements across instruments remains limited, hampering data comparison across laboratories and long‐term time series. Here, we used 10 flow cytometers from seven manufacturers to analyze population concentration and optical properties of polystyrene beads, cultured phytoplankton, and natural phytoplankton. Light‐scatter signals varied by more than two orders of magnitude across flow cytometers, reflecting differences in optical design and detector sensitivity. Light scattering calibration reduced this variability, lowering coefficients of variation from nearly 100% to below 15% in some cases, although small inter‐instrument differences remained. Despite these optical corrections, concentration measurements across instruments were highly variable, with coefficients of variation ranging from 10% to 133%, which can obscure ecological signals in phytoplankton distributions. Population gating contributed minimally to this variability, with no significant difference between expert and novice users (ANOVA, F < 0.001, p > 0.99). Among laboratory culture and field samples, Prochlorococcus concentrations had the highest variability (CV = 56%) and Synechococcus the lowest (CV = 20%). Variance decomposition attributed ~ 80% of concentration variability to hardware characteristics, including optical design, detector sensitivity, and volume‐measurement methodology. These findings show that while optical properties can be standardized through calibration, instrument differences still dominate uncertainty in concentration estimates. With shared calibration tools for both optical and concentration measurements, marine flow cytometry could achieve the consistency needed to enable global, long‐term syntheses of phytoplankton optical properties and abundance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Limnology and Oceanography Methods
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.70085
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flow cytometric phytoplankton concentration and optical properties across instruments and laboratories

Angelicque White, Heidi M. Sosik, François Ribalet, Josep M. Gasol et al.
Limnology and Oceanography Methods
Marine and coastal ecosystems
article

Flow cytometric phytoplankton concentration and optical properties across instruments and laboratories

Angelicque White, Heidi M. Sosik, François Ribalet, Josep M. Gasol, Raffaella Casotti, Zackary Johnson, Nicole J. Poulton, Anne W. Thompson, E. Virginia Armbrust, Emily Peacock, Massimo C. Pernice
article en

Abstract

Abstract Flow cytometry measures the optical properties of individual cells and has become essential for enumerating and characterizing marine phytoplankton. Yet systematic comparison of measurements across instruments remains limited, hampering data comparison across laboratories and long‐term time series. Here, we used 10 flow cytometers from seven manufacturers to analyze population concentration and optical properties of polystyrene beads, cultured phytoplankton, and natural phytoplankton. Light‐scatter signals varied by more than two orders of magnitude across flow cytometers, reflecting differences in optical design and detector sensitivity. Light scattering calibration reduced this variability, lowering coefficients of variation from nearly 100% to below 15% in some cases, although small inter‐instrument differences remained. Despite these optical corrections, concentration measurements across instruments were highly variable, with coefficients of variation ranging from 10% to 133%, which can obscure ecological signals in phytoplankton distributions. Population gating contributed minimally to this variability, with no significant difference between expert and novice users (ANOVA, F < 0.001, p > 0.99). Among laboratory culture and field samples, Prochlorococcus concentrations had the highest variability (CV = 56%) and Synechococcus the lowest (CV = 20%). Variance decomposition attributed ~ 80% of concentration variability to hardware characteristics, including optical design, detector sensitivity, and volume‐measurement methodology. These findings show that while optical properties can be standardized through calibration, instrument differences still dominate uncertainty in concentration estimates. With shared calibration tools for both optical and concentration measurements, marine flow cytometry could achieve the consistency needed to enable global, long‐term syntheses of phytoplankton optical properties and abundance.

Limnology and Oceanography Methods
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Portland State University (US), University of Washington (US), Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences (US), Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn (IT), Instituto Español de Oceanografía (ES), Institut Català de Ciències del Clima (ES), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US), University of South Carolina Beaufort (US)
Directorate-General for Environment, Simons Foundation, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Division of Environmental Biology
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.