Negotiating authority and hierarchy amongst UK and Australian nurses

BackgroundAuthority and hierarchy shape nursing practice, influencing professional relationships, decision-making, advocacy and patient care. Although these concepts are widely present in healthcare, they are often examined indirectly through issues such as communication, bullying, professional status or organisational culture, rather than as phenomena in their own right.Research question/aim/objectivesThe aim of this study was to explore how nurses and midwives in the United Kingdom and Australia experience authority and navigate hierarchy in their work, and the consequences of these dynamics for ethical practice.Research designA qualitative study was conducted using online semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis, following COREQ reporting guidance.Participants and research context10 registered nurses and midwives from the United Kingdom and Australia participated. Participants worked across clinical, educational and academic contexts, with some still in full-time clinical practice and others having moved into non-clinical roles.Ethical considerationsEthical approval was granted by an institutional ethics committee. Participants provided informed consent. Given the sensitivity of the topic and the small sample, detailed demographic information was not collected or reported to protect confidentiality.Findings/resultsFive interconnected forms of authority were identified: professional, regulatory, theoretical, institutional and political. Authority was experienced as dynamic, relational and context-dependent, shifting across roles, relationships and settings. Participants described nursing as often positioned as subordinate within healthcare hierarchies, while also exercising authority through advocacy, expertise, influence and everyday resistance. Regulatory and institutional structures were experienced as both enabling and constraining, legitimising professional action while also limiting what could be said or done.ConclusionsAuthority in nursing is not fixed or determined solely by role or position, but it is continually negotiated in everyday practice. Nurses both reproduce and resist hierarchical structures while managing tensions between advocacy, compliance, professional risk and patient care, with authority and hierarchy shaping a range of ethical features of practice, including autonomy, communication and moral distress. Greater recognition of these dynamics may support safer, more ethical and more responsive healthcare systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Ethics
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330261476268
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiating authority and hierarchy amongst UK and Australian nurses

Ada Hui, Lydia Mainey, Ryan Essex
Nursing Ethics
Ethics in medical practice
article

Negotiating authority and hierarchy amongst UK and Australian nurses

Ada Hui, Lydia Mainey, Ryan Essex
article en

Abstract

BackgroundAuthority and hierarchy shape nursing practice, influencing professional relationships, decision-making, advocacy and patient care. Although these concepts are widely present in healthcare, they are often examined indirectly through issues such as communication, bullying, professional status or organisational culture, rather than as phenomena in their own right.Research question/aim/objectivesThe aim of this study was to explore how nurses and midwives in the United Kingdom and Australia experience authority and navigate hierarchy in their work, and the consequences of these dynamics for ethical practice.Research designA qualitative study was conducted using online semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed inductively using reflexive thematic analysis, following COREQ reporting guidance.Participants and research context10 registered nurses and midwives from the United Kingdom and Australia participated. Participants worked across clinical, educational and academic contexts, with some still in full-time clinical practice and others having moved into non-clinical roles.Ethical considerationsEthical approval was granted by an institutional ethics committee. Participants provided informed consent. Given the sensitivity of the topic and the small sample, detailed demographic information was not collected or reported to protect confidentiality.Findings/resultsFive interconnected forms of authority were identified: professional, regulatory, theoretical, institutional and political. Authority was experienced as dynamic, relational and context-dependent, shifting across roles, relationships and settings. Participants described nursing as often positioned as subordinate within healthcare hierarchies, while also exercising authority through advocacy, expertise, influence and everyday resistance. Regulatory and institutional structures were experienced as both enabling and constraining, legitimising professional action while also limiting what could be said or done.ConclusionsAuthority in nursing is not fixed or determined solely by role or position, but it is continually negotiated in everyday practice. Nurses both reproduce and resist hierarchical structures while managing tensions between advocacy, compliance, professional risk and patient care, with authority and hierarchy shaping a range of ethical features of practice, including autonomy, communication and moral distress. Greater recognition of these dynamics may support safer, more ethical and more responsive healthcare systems.

Nursing Ethics
Royal College of Nursing (GB), The George Institute for Global Health (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), Central Queensland University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.