Extending a Formal Model of Predictive Coding to Human Spoken Word Recognition

There is a general consensus in theories of human speech recognition that humans engage in predictive processing during online speech processing. There are also claims that predictive processing is indicative of the operation of a predictive coding (PC) mechanism. PC is a generative, hierarchical feedback framework where feedback signals consist of input predictions, while feedforward signals consist primarily of prediction errors (PE). Some researchers have taken decreased neural signals when inputs conform to expectations as evidence for PC and claim that other possible explanatory frameworks (e.g., interactive activation) are incompatible with reported reductions in PE. However, these claims have been advanced using narrow-scope computational implementations of PC without known abilities to adequately (i.e., plausibly; simulate broader human spoken word recognition (SWR) behavioral phenomena. Here, we present the first known neurally and behaviorally adequate, mathematically formal neural network PC model of time-dependent human SWR. After demonstrating that the new model is able to emulate a fundamental, empirical signature of human SWR behavior (time course of lexical activation and competition, we compare model dynamics to neural performance targets that have been touted as hallmarks of PC in SWR. While the new model readily exhibits predictive processing (anticipatory activation of phonemes consistent with lexical knowledge) and reduced neural activity when inputs match expectations (a necessary component of PC more subtle patterns of neural activity under priming and noise conditions, previously proposed as diagnostic of PC do not emerge appreciably. This suggests that such patterns may not be hallmarks of PC. We discuss implications for PC-based theories of SWR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neural Computation
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.a.1570
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extending a Formal Model of Predictive Coding to Human Spoken Word Recognition

James S. Magnuson, Thomas Hannagan, Kevin S. Brown, Monica Yi-Chen Li et al.
Neural Computation
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Extending a Formal Model of Predictive Coding to Human Spoken Word Recognition

James S. Magnuson, Thomas Hannagan, Kevin S. Brown, Monica Yi-Chen Li, Bryce Rogers
article en

Abstract

There is a general consensus in theories of human speech recognition that humans engage in predictive processing during online speech processing. There are also claims that predictive processing is indicative of the operation of a predictive coding (PC) mechanism. PC is a generative, hierarchical feedback framework where feedback signals consist of input predictions, while feedforward signals consist primarily of prediction errors (PE). Some researchers have taken decreased neural signals when inputs conform to expectations as evidence for PC and claim that other possible explanatory frameworks (e.g., interactive activation) are incompatible with reported reductions in PE. However, these claims have been advanced using narrow-scope computational implementations of PC without known abilities to adequately (i.e., plausibly; simulate broader human spoken word recognition (SWR) behavioral phenomena. Here, we present the first known neurally and behaviorally adequate, mathematically formal neural network PC model of time-dependent human SWR. After demonstrating that the new model is able to emulate a fundamental, empirical signature of human SWR behavior (time course of lexical activation and competition, we compare model dynamics to neural performance targets that have been touted as hallmarks of PC in SWR. While the new model readily exhibits predictive processing (anticipatory activation of phonemes consistent with lexical knowledge) and reduced neural activity when inputs match expectations (a necessary component of PC more subtle patterns of neural activity under priming and noise conditions, previously proposed as diagnostic of PC do not emerge appreciably. This suggests that such patterns may not be hallmarks of PC. We discuss implications for PC-based theories of SWR.

Neural Computation
Ikerbasque (ES), Oregon State University (US), University of Connecticut (US), Steinbeis Foundation (DE), Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.