Financial architecture and environmental sustainability: nonlinear and conditional evidence from OECD economies

Financial systems can intensify environmental pressures through economic expansion but can also support clean technologies, renewable energy investment, and efficient resource allocation. This study examines how financial development, financial inclusion, and digital financialisation jointly relate to environmental sustainability across 30 OECD economies from 2014 to 2024. It develops an integrated financial architecture framework in which these dimensions represent the complementary functions of financial capacity, accessibility, and efficiency. Carbon emissions, ecological footprint, and renewable energy consumption capture aspects of environmental performance. Cross-Sectionally Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lag and Dynamic Common Correlated Effects Mean Group estimators account for cross-sectional dependence, country heterogeneity, and dynamic adjustment. The findings reveal nonlinear associations between financial development and environmental outcomes. Financial development is associated with higher carbon emissions and ecological pressure at lower levels but improved environmental performance beyond estimated turning points, while renewable energy consumption follows a U-shaped pattern. Financial inclusion and digital financialisation are consistently associated with better environmental performance, with digital financialisation exhibiting the strongest relationship. Institutional quality reinforces favourable outcomes, whereas energy intensity constrains them. Robustness analyses using a principal-component-based composite financial architecture index, alternative estimators, threshold validation, and subsample estimations produce broadly consistent results. The findings indicate that the environmental implications of finance depend on its expansion, accessibility, digital efficiency, institutional setting, and structural conditions. Policies should therefore align financial development, inclusion, digitalisation, institutional quality, and energy efficiency to advance environmental sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2026.2714446
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financial architecture and environmental sustainability: nonlinear and conditional evidence from OECD economies

Abdullah A. Aljughaiman, Ridwan Lanre Ibrahim, Abdulrahman Alomair, Jieyu Song
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Financial architecture and environmental sustainability: nonlinear and conditional evidence from OECD economies

Abdullah A. Aljughaiman, Ridwan Lanre Ibrahim, Abdulrahman Alomair, Jieyu Song
article en

Abstract

Financial systems can intensify environmental pressures through economic expansion but can also support clean technologies, renewable energy investment, and efficient resource allocation. This study examines how financial development, financial inclusion, and digital financialisation jointly relate to environmental sustainability across 30 OECD economies from 2014 to 2024. It develops an integrated financial architecture framework in which these dimensions represent the complementary functions of financial capacity, accessibility, and efficiency. Carbon emissions, ecological footprint, and renewable energy consumption capture aspects of environmental performance. Cross-Sectionally Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lag and Dynamic Common Correlated Effects Mean Group estimators account for cross-sectional dependence, country heterogeneity, and dynamic adjustment. The findings reveal nonlinear associations between financial development and environmental outcomes. Financial development is associated with higher carbon emissions and ecological pressure at lower levels but improved environmental performance beyond estimated turning points, while renewable energy consumption follows a U-shaped pattern. Financial inclusion and digital financialisation are consistently associated with better environmental performance, with digital financialisation exhibiting the strongest relationship. Institutional quality reinforces favourable outcomes, whereas energy intensity constrains them. Robustness analyses using a principal-component-based composite financial architecture index, alternative estimators, threshold validation, and subsample estimations produce broadly consistent results. The findings indicate that the environmental implications of finance depend on its expansion, accessibility, digital efficiency, institutional setting, and structural conditions. Policies should therefore align financial development, inclusion, digitalisation, institutional quality, and energy efficiency to advance environmental sustainability.

International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology
European University of Lefke (TR), Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN), King Faisal University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.