Clinical and Economic Trade-Offs in Antifungal Therapy for Invasive Aspergillosis and Mucormycosis: A Markov Model–Based Analysis

Invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis are life-threatening fungal infections characterized by high early mortality, substantial toxicity, and intensive healthcare resource utilization. While multiple antifungal therapies are recommended in international guidelines, their comparative clinical and economic value remains uncertain, particularly in resource-limited settings. We developed a hybrid decision tree and Markov model to evaluate antifungal strategies, including liposomal amphotericin B, isavuconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and caspofungin, from the perspective of the Colombian healthcare system over a 6-month horizon. Health states included clinical response, treatment failure, toxicity, and death. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and net monetary benefit (NMB). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. In invasive aspergillosis, isavuconazole provided a modest incremental benefit over voriconazole (+0.022 QALYs), driven primarily by improved tolerability, at an incremental cost of COP 3.4 million, yielding an ICER of COP 154.5 million/QALY. In mucormycosis, liposomal amphotericin B yielded greater survival benefits (+0.035 QALYs) but at substantially higher costs (ICER: COP 494.3 million/QALY). Across willingness-to-pay thresholds, isavuconazole and voriconazole demonstrated more favorable economic profiles, owing to lower toxicity and reduced hospitalizations. These findings highlight that the clinical–economic value of antifungal therapy is primarily determined by early survival gains, toxicity burden, and front-loaded costs. Strategies minimizing toxicity and hospitalization appear more efficient in constrained health systems, whereas survival-maximizing approaches may be justified in severe disease. This integrated analysis supports context-specific antifungal decision-making in the management of invasive fungal infections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fungi
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12080608
Primary Topic
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Economic Trade-Offs in Antifungal Therapy for Invasive Aspergillosis and Mucormycosis: A Markov Model–Based Analysis

Liliana Encinales, Óscar Madiedo, J A Mendez, Marianna Carrillo-Encinales et al.
Journal of Fungi
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
article

Clinical and Economic Trade-Offs in Antifungal Therapy for Invasive Aspergillosis and Mucormycosis: A Markov Model–Based Analysis

Liliana Encinales, Óscar Madiedo, J A Mendez, Marianna Carrillo-Encinales, alexandra porras ramirez, Zuly Moreno Perilla, Juan Pablo Duque Bolívar, Juan Fernando Ramón Cuellar, Roberto Jurado Zambrano, Alejandro Rico Mendoza
article en

Abstract

Invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis are life-threatening fungal infections characterized by high early mortality, substantial toxicity, and intensive healthcare resource utilization. While multiple antifungal therapies are recommended in international guidelines, their comparative clinical and economic value remains uncertain, particularly in resource-limited settings. We developed a hybrid decision tree and Markov model to evaluate antifungal strategies, including liposomal amphotericin B, isavuconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and caspofungin, from the perspective of the Colombian healthcare system over a 6-month horizon. Health states included clinical response, treatment failure, toxicity, and death. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and net monetary benefit (NMB). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. In invasive aspergillosis, isavuconazole provided a modest incremental benefit over voriconazole (+0.022 QALYs), driven primarily by improved tolerability, at an incremental cost of COP 3.4 million, yielding an ICER of COP 154.5 million/QALY. In mucormycosis, liposomal amphotericin B yielded greater survival benefits (+0.035 QALYs) but at substantially higher costs (ICER: COP 494.3 million/QALY). Across willingness-to-pay thresholds, isavuconazole and voriconazole demonstrated more favorable economic profiles, owing to lower toxicity and reduced hospitalizations. These findings highlight that the clinical–economic value of antifungal therapy is primarily determined by early survival gains, toxicity burden, and front-loaded costs. Strategies minimizing toxicity and hospitalization appear more efficient in constrained health systems, whereas survival-maximizing approaches may be justified in severe disease. This integrated analysis supports context-specific antifungal decision-making in the management of invasive fungal infections.

Journal of FungiVol. 12(8)
Universidad de Los Andes (CO), Universidad El Bosque (CO), Universidad Metropolitana (CO), Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.