Givenness as the Opening of All Phenomenological Possibility: Marion’s Overcoming of Henry Through Heidegger

Taking into account that Marion studied Sein und Zeit simultaneously with Henry’s opus magnum, L’essence de la manifestation, one may read his phenomenology of givenness as an overcoming of the aporias that Henry identifies in Heidegger; aporias that, as Marion argues, persist in Henry’s own solutions. In this way, following Heidegger’s principle that possibility stands higher than actuality, Marion overcomes Henry’s non-ecstatic phenomenology of life, which closes the phenomenological field in a pure immanence. Contrary to Henry, Marion argues that the structure of call and response fulfils, more radically than any phenomenology of immanence, Heidegger’s own definition of phenomenology as letting the phenomenon show itself in and from itself. Moreover, the study of Heidegger’s Beiträge, a text that only became publicly available in 1989, and which Marion never cites, reveals a remarkable convergence between Marion’s notion of revelation and Heidegger’s Ereignis, insofar as both think it is what gives itself unconditionally, exceeding every horizon of subjectivity, whether transcendental, intentional, or purely affective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophies
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies11040145
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Givenness as the Opening of All Phenomenological Possibility: Marion’s Overcoming of Henry Through Heidegger

Andreas Gonçalves Lind
Philosophies
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

Givenness as the Opening of All Phenomenological Possibility: Marion’s Overcoming of Henry Through Heidegger

Andreas Gonçalves Lind
article en

Abstract

Taking into account that Marion studied Sein und Zeit simultaneously with Henry’s opus magnum, L’essence de la manifestation, one may read his phenomenology of givenness as an overcoming of the aporias that Henry identifies in Heidegger; aporias that, as Marion argues, persist in Henry’s own solutions. In this way, following Heidegger’s principle that possibility stands higher than actuality, Marion overcomes Henry’s non-ecstatic phenomenology of life, which closes the phenomenological field in a pure immanence. Contrary to Henry, Marion argues that the structure of call and response fulfils, more radically than any phenomenology of immanence, Heidegger’s own definition of phenomenology as letting the phenomenon show itself in and from itself. Moreover, the study of Heidegger’s Beiträge, a text that only became publicly available in 1989, and which Marion never cites, reveals a remarkable convergence between Marion’s notion of revelation and Heidegger’s Ereignis, insofar as both think it is what gives itself unconditionally, exceeding every horizon of subjectivity, whether transcendental, intentional, or purely affective.

PhilosophiesVol. 11(4)
Pontifical Gregorian University (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.