Evaluation of analytical reliability based on variance index score, measurement uncertainty and root cause analysis in a 2-year external quality assessment scheme

Objectives: To evaluate analytical performance in a clinical biochemistry laboratory using an integrated approach combining variance index score (VIS), measurement uncertainty (MU), target score and root cause analysis (RCA) based on external quality assessment scheme (EQAS) data. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analytical study evaluated EQAS results generated over 2 years (January 2022 to December 2023) in a National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories-accredited tertiary-care clinical biochemistry laboratory. A total of 1,853 EQAS results covering 68 analytical parameters were analysed across multiple platforms and programmes, including Bio-Rad EQAS, Randox International Quality Assessment Scheme and the Quality Assurance Forum. Analytical performance was assessed using VIS, target score for immunoassays, MU estimated by the Nordtest top-down approach and structured RCA for EQAS outliers. Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics were applied. VIS, target score and MU were expressed as means with minimum and maximum values. EQAS outliers were reported as counts and percentages, and RCA findings were categorised by phase of error. Results: Of the 1,853 EQAS results analysed, 96.4% were within acceptable limits. Sixty-seven outliers (3.61%) were identified. Most deviations originated in the analytical phase (79.1%), followed by pre-analytical causes, while no post-analytical errors were observed. Routine chemistry, electrolyte and immunoassay parameters demonstrated predominantly good to excellent VIS and MU performance. Parathyroid hormone showed persistently high VIS and MU values, indicating analytical bias. Conclusions: The synthesis of VISs, MU, target scores and structured RCA offers a comprehensive framework for evaluating EQAS. Integrating these quality indicators streamlines the identification of analytical deviations, guides targeted corrective and preventive interventions and reinforces analytical reliability and continuous quality improvement within clinical biochemistry laboratories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/jlp_43_2026
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of analytical reliability based on variance index score, measurement uncertainty and root cause analysis in a 2-year external quality assessment scheme

Dharmikkumar Savjibhai Patel, Deepakji Ranguji Thakor, Nikita Dharmik Patel, Afsana Ahemadhusen Bloch
Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Evaluation of analytical reliability based on variance index score, measurement uncertainty and root cause analysis in a 2-year external quality assessment scheme

Dharmikkumar Savjibhai Patel, Deepakji Ranguji Thakor, Nikita Dharmik Patel, Afsana Ahemadhusen Bloch
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate analytical performance in a clinical biochemistry laboratory using an integrated approach combining variance index score (VIS), measurement uncertainty (MU), target score and root cause analysis (RCA) based on external quality assessment scheme (EQAS) data. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analytical study evaluated EQAS results generated over 2 years (January 2022 to December 2023) in a National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories-accredited tertiary-care clinical biochemistry laboratory. A total of 1,853 EQAS results covering 68 analytical parameters were analysed across multiple platforms and programmes, including Bio-Rad EQAS, Randox International Quality Assessment Scheme and the Quality Assurance Forum. Analytical performance was assessed using VIS, target score for immunoassays, MU estimated by the Nordtest top-down approach and structured RCA for EQAS outliers. Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics were applied. VIS, target score and MU were expressed as means with minimum and maximum values. EQAS outliers were reported as counts and percentages, and RCA findings were categorised by phase of error. Results: Of the 1,853 EQAS results analysed, 96.4% were within acceptable limits. Sixty-seven outliers (3.61%) were identified. Most deviations originated in the analytical phase (79.1%), followed by pre-analytical causes, while no post-analytical errors were observed. Routine chemistry, electrolyte and immunoassay parameters demonstrated predominantly good to excellent VIS and MU performance. Parathyroid hormone showed persistently high VIS and MU values, indicating analytical bias. Conclusions: The synthesis of VISs, MU, target scores and structured RCA offers a comprehensive framework for evaluating EQAS. Integrating these quality indicators streamlines the identification of analytical deviations, guides targeted corrective and preventive interventions and reinforces analytical reliability and continuous quality improvement within clinical biochemistry laboratories.

Journal of Laboratory PhysiciansVol. 0
Gandhi Medical College & Hospital (IN), Gujarat National Law University (IN), Pramukhswami Medical College (IN), M. P. Shah Medical College (IN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.