Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces surgical site infection in gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic laparotomy

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a major complication following gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary-pancreatic, and pancreatic surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in reducing SSIs following closed abdominal incisions. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 2016 to December 2025; all databases were last searched on December 31, 2025, without language restrictions. Both randomized and nonrandomized studies were included. The primary outcome was SSI, while wound dehiscence (WD) was considered a secondary outcome. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 (Cochrane, London, UK). Meta-analyses were performed using Stata/MP version 18.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station) with a random-effects model and Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman correction. A Sankey diagram was generated using Origin 2022 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton). RESULTS: A total of 10 studies (6 randomized trials and 4 retrospective studies) involving 3301 patients were included. Among them, 900 patients received NPWT, and 2401 patients received standard dressings. A random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman correction meta-analysis indicated that NPWT significantly reduced the overall incidence of SSI compared with standard dressings (odds ratio [OR] = 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41-0.99; P = .04). NPWT also significantly decreased the rates of superficial SSI (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.37-0.69; P < .01) and deep SSI (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.23-0.87; P = .03). However, no significant differences were observed for organ-space SSI or WD. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic NPWT reduces the risk of SSI among patients undergoing gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary-pancreatic, and pancreatic abdominal surgeries. Nevertheless, the rates of organ-space SSI and WD are comparable to those associated with standard dressings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000050174
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces surgical site infection in gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic laparotomy

Xin Wang, Xiaohui Gu, Yong Guan, Chao Liu et al.
Medicine
Surgical site infection prevention
article

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces surgical site infection in gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic laparotomy

Xin Wang, Xiaohui Gu, Yong Guan, Chao Liu, Shaocong Wang, Kelei Wang, Yanyun Long
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a major complication following gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary-pancreatic, and pancreatic surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in reducing SSIs following closed abdominal incisions. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 2016 to December 2025; all databases were last searched on December 31, 2025, without language restrictions. Both randomized and nonrandomized studies were included. The primary outcome was SSI, while wound dehiscence (WD) was considered a secondary outcome. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 (Cochrane, London, UK). Meta-analyses were performed using Stata/MP version 18.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station) with a random-effects model and Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman correction. A Sankey diagram was generated using Origin 2022 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton). RESULTS: A total of 10 studies (6 randomized trials and 4 retrospective studies) involving 3301 patients were included. Among them, 900 patients received NPWT, and 2401 patients received standard dressings. A random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman correction meta-analysis indicated that NPWT significantly reduced the overall incidence of SSI compared with standard dressings (odds ratio [OR] = 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41-0.99; P = .04). NPWT also significantly decreased the rates of superficial SSI (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.37-0.69; P < .01) and deep SSI (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.23-0.87; P = .03). However, no significant differences were observed for organ-space SSI or WD. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic NPWT reduces the risk of SSI among patients undergoing gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary-pancreatic, and pancreatic abdominal surgeries. Nevertheless, the rates of organ-space SSI and WD are comparable to those associated with standard dressings.

MedicineVol. 105(33)
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN), Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.