Resident Selection in the Signaling Era: A Survey of General Surgery Program Directors

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize program director experiences with and attitudes toward preference signaling after transitioning from 5 to 15 signals per applicant. This study also aimed to determine how program director experiences and attitudes were influenced by program type and competitiveness. DESIGN: An anonymous, voluntary survey was distributed in 2025 to all general surgery program directors with publicly available email addresses (n = 348). Survey items explored program director experiences with signaling. Descriptive analysis was performed. SETTING: Electronic survey administered to general surgery program directors. PARTICIPANTS: Forty PDs (55% university-based programs, 77.5% became PDs pre-signaling) completed the survey. RESULTS: All PDs used signals when reviewing applicants for interview: 42.5% reviewed all signaled applicants, 22.5% only reviewed signaled applicants, and 25% used signals as part of a scoring system to decide who to fully review. The majority of PDs (61%) felt that signals overall decreased application review time. Compared to 5 signals, 15 signals further decreased application review time and the number of applications fully reviewed. There were no statistically discernible differences in signaling practices by program type or competitiveness. All PDs supported the continuation of signaling, rating the current system of 15 signals as highly beneficial both to applicants (mean = 7.1/10) and programs (mean = 8.2/10). Further, while only about half (58%) of PDs were historically transparent regarding use of signals in application screening, the majority (84%) endorsed full transparency moving forward. CONCLUSIONS: In the 15-signal era, general surgery PDs used signals in a variety of ways during residency recruitment. PDs are supportive of the current signaling system, with more than half finding that the increase to 15 signals improved application review efficiency. Moving forward, transparency from programs will be crucial to ensure applicants understand how their signals are interpreted in the recruitment process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of surgical education
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2026.104102
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resident Selection in the Signaling Era: A Survey of General Surgery Program Directors

Szczepanski, Joseph C. L’Huillier, Jenny M. Guido, Dylan R. Nieman et al.
Journal of surgical education
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

Resident Selection in the Signaling Era: A Survey of General Surgery Program Directors

Szczepanski, Joseph C. L’Huillier, Jenny M. Guido, Dylan R. Nieman, Nina W. Zhao, Erika Simmerman Mabes, Darci C. Foote, Kirstyn E. Brownson, Noosha Deravi, Olabisi Sheppard, John M. Woodward, Nicole Santucci, Tasha Posid, Martha Godfrey, Sarah B. Lund, Milanie Milan, Jennifer Hechao Chen, Connie Gan, Benjamin D. Ferguson, Emma Gilman Burke, Colleen Mcdermott, Jonathan Davies, Prajjwol Luitel, Trenton Foster, Caitlin Silvestri
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize program director experiences with and attitudes toward preference signaling after transitioning from 5 to 15 signals per applicant. This study also aimed to determine how program director experiences and attitudes were influenced by program type and competitiveness. DESIGN: An anonymous, voluntary survey was distributed in 2025 to all general surgery program directors with publicly available email addresses (n = 348). Survey items explored program director experiences with signaling. Descriptive analysis was performed. SETTING: Electronic survey administered to general surgery program directors. PARTICIPANTS: Forty PDs (55% university-based programs, 77.5% became PDs pre-signaling) completed the survey. RESULTS: All PDs used signals when reviewing applicants for interview: 42.5% reviewed all signaled applicants, 22.5% only reviewed signaled applicants, and 25% used signals as part of a scoring system to decide who to fully review. The majority of PDs (61%) felt that signals overall decreased application review time. Compared to 5 signals, 15 signals further decreased application review time and the number of applications fully reviewed. There were no statistically discernible differences in signaling practices by program type or competitiveness. All PDs supported the continuation of signaling, rating the current system of 15 signals as highly beneficial both to applicants (mean = 7.1/10) and programs (mean = 8.2/10). Further, while only about half (58%) of PDs were historically transparent regarding use of signals in application screening, the majority (84%) endorsed full transparency moving forward. CONCLUSIONS: In the 15-signal era, general surgery PDs used signals in a variety of ways during residency recruitment. PDs are supportive of the current signaling system, with more than half finding that the increase to 15 signals improved application review efficiency. Moving forward, transparency from programs will be crucial to ensure applicants understand how their signals are interpreted in the recruitment process.

Journal of surgical educationVol. 83(10)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Iowa (US), Mayo Clinic (US), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Georgetown University (US), University of South Dakota (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Utah (US), Augusta University (US), Indiana University Hospital (US), University of Michigan (US), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), WellStar Kennestone Hospital (US), Johnson University (US), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (NP), Duke Medical Center (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Jacobs (United States) (US), University School (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Case Western Reserve University (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), Michigan State University (US)
Association for Surgical Education Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.