How Cognitive Load Affects Dynamic Trust Calibration in Human–AI Collaboration: Evidence for Selective Pathway Effects

ObjectiveThis study examined whether cognitive load produces selective effects on different trust updating pathways in AI-assisted decision making.BackgroundAlthough cognitive load affects trust in automation, its influence on the mechanisms of trial-by-trial trust updating remains unclear.MethodsA dual-task paradigm embedded in a mining exploration task manipulated cognitive load while capturing dynamic trust calibration. Guided by a dual-pathway framework, we operationalized process-based (analytical evaluation of AI recommendation correctness) and outcome-based (heuristic reliance on task outcomes) trust updating pathways. Trust dynamics and behavioral reliance were examined using linear mixed-effects models.ResultsCognitive load shifted the relative influence of the two trust updating pathways. Process-based updating was attenuated under high cognitive load, indicating reduced sensitivity to AI recommendation correctness during trust updating. Outcome-based information gained greater influence under high load, amplifying outcome-driven bias regardless of recommendation correctness. Asymmetric trust updating was evident overall, although the influence of cognitive load on this asymmetry depended on task outcomes. Overall, high cognitive load elevated both subjective trust and behavioral reliance on AI.ConclusionCognitive load shapes trust calibration through mechanism-level reconfiguration rather than global impairment. By revealing how cognitive constraints rebalance dual trust pathways-weakening analytic evaluation while amplifying heuristic outcome reliance-this study advances theoretical understanding of dynamic trust in human-AI collaboration.ApplicationThe results provide practical guidance for the design of AI systems in high-stakes settings, highlighting the need to support analytic trust updating and mitigate over-reliance under cognitive strain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261477486
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Cognitive Load Affects Dynamic Trust Calibration in Human–AI Collaboration: Evidence for Selective Pathway Effects

Zaifeng Gao, Zhengyu Wang, Yiran Ma, Xiaojiao Chen et al.
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

How Cognitive Load Affects Dynamic Trust Calibration in Human–AI Collaboration: Evidence for Selective Pathway Effects

Zaifeng Gao, Zhengyu Wang, Yiran Ma, Xiaojiao Chen, Yu Tian, Yonghao Chen, Yonghan Liu, Wenxin Zhang, Mowei Shen, Xinyu Zhang
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study examined whether cognitive load produces selective effects on different trust updating pathways in AI-assisted decision making.BackgroundAlthough cognitive load affects trust in automation, its influence on the mechanisms of trial-by-trial trust updating remains unclear.MethodsA dual-task paradigm embedded in a mining exploration task manipulated cognitive load while capturing dynamic trust calibration. Guided by a dual-pathway framework, we operationalized process-based (analytical evaluation of AI recommendation correctness) and outcome-based (heuristic reliance on task outcomes) trust updating pathways. Trust dynamics and behavioral reliance were examined using linear mixed-effects models.ResultsCognitive load shifted the relative influence of the two trust updating pathways. Process-based updating was attenuated under high cognitive load, indicating reduced sensitivity to AI recommendation correctness during trust updating. Outcome-based information gained greater influence under high load, amplifying outcome-driven bias regardless of recommendation correctness. Asymmetric trust updating was evident overall, although the influence of cognitive load on this asymmetry depended on task outcomes. Overall, high cognitive load elevated both subjective trust and behavioral reliance on AI.ConclusionCognitive load shapes trust calibration through mechanism-level reconfiguration rather than global impairment. By revealing how cognitive constraints rebalance dual trust pathways-weakening analytic evaluation while amplifying heuristic outcome reliance-this study advances theoretical understanding of dynamic trust in human-AI collaboration.ApplicationThe results provide practical guidance for the design of AI systems in high-stakes settings, highlighting the need to support analytic trust updating and mitigate over-reliance under cognitive strain.

Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Human Factors (Norway) (NO), China Astronaut Research and Training Center (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.