Does innovation credit reduce informal finance? Evidence from China

Purpose This paper aims to investigate how innovation-oriented credit policies affect firm financing behavior in emerging economies, using China’s Promote Sci-Tech and Finance Integration initiative as a quasi-natural experiment. Design/methodology/approach Using an unbalanced panel of Chinese A-share firms from 2006 to 2020, this study estimates the policy effect with a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) design. Findings Rather than reducing reliance on informal finance, the policy led to increased use of trade credit, as subsidized loans were diverted along supply chains through receivables and prepayments. The effect is most pronounced among politically unconnected and non-high-tech firms, suggesting a strategic adaptation to credit incentives. Further analysis shows that firms engaged in research and development (R&D) reporting manipulation are more likely to channel funds toward short-term financial intermediation. Originality/value These findings highlight how institutional capacity, rather than credit availability alone, determines the success of financial reforms. The study offers broader implications for policy design across Asia-Pacific economies seeking to foster innovation through credit-based interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial Economic Policy
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfep-01-2026-0029
Primary Topic
Working Capital and Financial Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does innovation credit reduce informal finance? Evidence from China

Qianqian Wang
Journal of Financial Economic Policy
Working Capital and Financial Performance
article

Does innovation credit reduce informal finance? Evidence from China

Qianqian Wang
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate how innovation-oriented credit policies affect firm financing behavior in emerging economies, using China’s Promote Sci-Tech and Finance Integration initiative as a quasi-natural experiment. Design/methodology/approach Using an unbalanced panel of Chinese A-share firms from 2006 to 2020, this study estimates the policy effect with a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) design. Findings Rather than reducing reliance on informal finance, the policy led to increased use of trade credit, as subsidized loans were diverted along supply chains through receivables and prepayments. The effect is most pronounced among politically unconnected and non-high-tech firms, suggesting a strategic adaptation to credit incentives. Further analysis shows that firms engaged in research and development (R&D) reporting manipulation are more likely to channel funds toward short-term financial intermediation. Originality/value These findings highlight how institutional capacity, rather than credit availability alone, determines the success of financial reforms. The study offers broader implications for policy design across Asia-Pacific economies seeking to foster innovation through credit-based interventions.

Journal of Financial Economic Policy
Nanjing University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Working Capital and Financial Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.