Understanding Trade-Offs in Continuous Neural Representations for Diffeomorphic Image Registration: A Comparative Study of Implicit Neural Representations and Neural Ordinary Differential Equations

Non-rigid image registration is a fundamental problem in medical imaging and a representative example of continuous transformation modeling in image processing. Diffeomorphic registration methods, such as Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping (LDDMM) and its PDE-constrained variants (PDE-LDDMM), provide mathematically grounded formulations with strong geometric guarantees for transformation quality. However, existing approaches face persistent trade-offs between numerical stability, accuracy, and computational efficiency. Recent work has explored implicit neural representations (INRs) and neural ordinary differential equations (NODEs) as flexible neural representations for modeling continuous transformations. Despite their increasing adoption, their practical behavior and limitations in diffeomorphic registration remain insufficiently understood. In this paper, we present a unified formulation of INR- and NODE-based registration methods within LDDMM and PDE-LDDMM, enabling a systematic and controlled comparison across architectures, sampling strategies, and numerical solvers. Our analysis reveals fundamental trade-offs between these approaches. In particular, we show that MLP-based INR formulations introduce significant computational overhead and rely on sampling strategies that can degrade smoothness and lead to the increased occurrence of non-diffeomorphic transformations at higher resolutions. Moreover, these approximations do not fully alleviate the computational cost, with some variants exceeding the costs of expensive classical optimization-based methods. In contrast, NODE-based formulations and downsampling strategies consistently provide transformations with more controlled Jacobian extrema while maintaining competitive computational performance. Among the evaluated methods, the original NODE-LDDMM and NODE-PDE-LDDMM formulations achieve the most favorable trade-offs between registration accuracy, geometric consistency, and computational efficiency. These findings provide clear insights into the design of neural representations for continuous transformation modeling, with practical implications for diffeomorphic registration and computational anatomy applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Imaging
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12080384
Primary Topic
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Trade-Offs in Continuous Neural Representations for Diffeomorphic Image Registration: A Comparative Study of Implicit Neural Representations and Neural Ordinary Differential Equations

Mónica Hernández, Salvador Rodriguez-Sanz, Carlos Paesa Lía
Journal of Imaging
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
article

Understanding Trade-Offs in Continuous Neural Representations for Diffeomorphic Image Registration: A Comparative Study of Implicit Neural Representations and Neural Ordinary Differential Equations

Mónica Hernández, Salvador Rodriguez-Sanz, Carlos Paesa Lía
article en

Abstract

Non-rigid image registration is a fundamental problem in medical imaging and a representative example of continuous transformation modeling in image processing. Diffeomorphic registration methods, such as Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping (LDDMM) and its PDE-constrained variants (PDE-LDDMM), provide mathematically grounded formulations with strong geometric guarantees for transformation quality. However, existing approaches face persistent trade-offs between numerical stability, accuracy, and computational efficiency. Recent work has explored implicit neural representations (INRs) and neural ordinary differential equations (NODEs) as flexible neural representations for modeling continuous transformations. Despite their increasing adoption, their practical behavior and limitations in diffeomorphic registration remain insufficiently understood. In this paper, we present a unified formulation of INR- and NODE-based registration methods within LDDMM and PDE-LDDMM, enabling a systematic and controlled comparison across architectures, sampling strategies, and numerical solvers. Our analysis reveals fundamental trade-offs between these approaches. In particular, we show that MLP-based INR formulations introduce significant computational overhead and rely on sampling strategies that can degrade smoothness and lead to the increased occurrence of non-diffeomorphic transformations at higher resolutions. Moreover, these approximations do not fully alleviate the computational cost, with some variants exceeding the costs of expensive classical optimization-based methods. In contrast, NODE-based formulations and downsampling strategies consistently provide transformations with more controlled Jacobian extrema while maintaining competitive computational performance. Among the evaluated methods, the original NODE-LDDMM and NODE-PDE-LDDMM formulations achieve the most favorable trade-offs between registration accuracy, geometric consistency, and computational efficiency. These findings provide clear insights into the design of neural representations for continuous transformation modeling, with practical implications for diffeomorphic registration and computational anatomy applications.

Journal of ImagingVol. 12(8)
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Instituto de Nanociencia y Materiales de Aragón (ES)
European Commission, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Gobierno de Aragón, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.