Comparison of Role-play (Expert Interview) with the Standard Seminars Teaching for the Residents: An Interventional Study

Background: Seminars offer a platform for disseminating knowledge through presentations, discussions, and interactions.They offer a structured environment for the exchange of information, where students can learn from experts, share ideas, and gain insights into various medical topics.This usually does not impart the decision-making skills that students encounter in real-time.Watching an interview as role-play may enhance learners' skills to critically appraise, in-depth knowledge, and more ways to communicate their thought process.So, to see the comparative effect of role-play where two experts played a scene of viva voce (interview) vs a seminar, this study was conducted from April 2024 to December 2024.Objective: To assess improvements in grades after teaching by role-play (interview) in comparison with standard seminar teaching of Postgraduate (PG) students.Methods: It is an interventional prospective study.Two arms had seminars and an expert interview role-play.Pre-and post-assessment was done and compared between the groups, and repeated once after 2 months to assess long-term learning.Results: The study enrolled a total of 71 participants, who were randomly allocated to the two groups: A (standard teaching-seminars) and B (intervention-expert interview).We found that in both intervention groups, there was a significant improvement in the mean scores of post-tests, with a statistically significant mean difference between the pre-and post-test scores, with a p-value of < 0.001 after applying a paired t-test across each intervention group, but the intervention is performing similarly to the traditional teaching method.When we compared long-term retention, it appears to be better in the intervention group.Conclusion: Learning by watching the discussion of experts gives more insight, and long-term retention is found to be higher in comparison with traditional teaching.Thus, bidirectional discussion of experts gives more troubleshots to the learners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
National Journal of Emergency Medicine SEMI
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/njem-11015-0100
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Role-play (Expert Interview) with the Standard Seminars Teaching for the Residents: An Interventional Study

Divendu Bhushan, Jaynul Aabidin, Aaruni Rahul, Vishal Vaibhaw et al.
National Journal of Emergency Medicine SEMI
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Comparison of Role-play (Expert Interview) with the Standard Seminars Teaching for the Residents: An Interventional Study

Divendu Bhushan, Jaynul Aabidin, Aaruni Rahul, Vishal Vaibhaw, Deepak Kumar, Haripriya H, Sunil Kumar
article en

Abstract

Background: Seminars offer a platform for disseminating knowledge through presentations, discussions, and interactions.They offer a structured environment for the exchange of information, where students can learn from experts, share ideas, and gain insights into various medical topics.This usually does not impart the decision-making skills that students encounter in real-time.Watching an interview as role-play may enhance learners' skills to critically appraise, in-depth knowledge, and more ways to communicate their thought process.So, to see the comparative effect of role-play where two experts played a scene of viva voce (interview) vs a seminar, this study was conducted from April 2024 to December 2024.Objective: To assess improvements in grades after teaching by role-play (interview) in comparison with standard seminar teaching of Postgraduate (PG) students.Methods: It is an interventional prospective study.Two arms had seminars and an expert interview role-play.Pre-and post-assessment was done and compared between the groups, and repeated once after 2 months to assess long-term learning.Results: The study enrolled a total of 71 participants, who were randomly allocated to the two groups: A (standard teaching-seminars) and B (intervention-expert interview).We found that in both intervention groups, there was a significant improvement in the mean scores of post-tests, with a statistically significant mean difference between the pre-and post-test scores, with a p-value of < 0.001 after applying a paired t-test across each intervention group, but the intervention is performing similarly to the traditional teaching method.When we compared long-term retention, it appears to be better in the intervention group.Conclusion: Learning by watching the discussion of experts gives more insight, and long-term retention is found to be higher in comparison with traditional teaching.Thus, bidirectional discussion of experts gives more troubleshots to the learners.

National Journal of Emergency Medicine SEMIVol. 4(2)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.