Availability, Accessibility, Implementation, and Perceived Effectiveness of Clinical Practice Guidelines Among Healthcare Professionals in District Teaching Hospitals in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

<ns5:p>Background Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are essential evidence-based tools for safe, effective, high-quality healthcare, yet evidence on their availability, accessibility, implementation, and perceived effectiveness in South African district teaching hospitals remains limited. This study evaluated these domains and barriers to CPG use among healthcare professionals in two district teaching hospitals in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Methods A facility-based cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured, self-administered questionnaire assessing CPG availability, accessibility, implementation, perceived effectiveness, and implementation barriers. Descriptive statistics summarized participant characteristics and responses, while independent-samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA examined differences in composite domain scores across participant characteristics. Results A total of 169 healthcare professionals participated (response rate: 73.8%); 76.3% were female and 79.9% were nurses. Overall, 71.0% reported that CPGs were available in their facilities and 72.2% considered them relevant to the local disease burden, but only 44.3% believed guidelines were updated regularly. Printed hard copies (30.2%) and multiple access methods (26.7%) predominated, whereas digital resources (8.1%) and mobile applications (9.3%) were infrequently used; 7.0% reported no access. Frequent CPG use (80.5%) and confidence in applying guidelines (88.8%) were high, although only 53.9% reported adequate training. Participants perceived CPGs as highly effective in improving patient outcomes (98.8%), reducing clinical errors (97.0%), and enhancing quality of care (95.3%). Principal implementation barriers were inadequate resources (85.8%), staff shortages (76.9%), and insufficient training (72.2%). Conclusions CPGs were generally available, widely used, and perceived as highly effective in supporting evidence-based care in district teaching hospitals. However, gaps remain in guideline updating, equitable access, digital availability, and healthcare worker training. Strengthening institutional support through regular revision, expanded digital access, adequate resourcing, and continuous professional development may enhance CPG implementation and sustainability in resource-constrained settings.</ns5:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.188193.1
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Availability, Accessibility, Implementation, and Perceived Effectiveness of Clinical Practice Guidelines Among Healthcare Professionals in District Teaching Hospitals in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

Thokoe Vincent Makola, Mirabel Kah-Keh Nanjoh, Ntandazo Dlatu, Guillermo-Alfredo Pulido-Estrada et al.
F1000Research
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

Availability, Accessibility, Implementation, and Perceived Effectiveness of Clinical Practice Guidelines Among Healthcare Professionals in District Teaching Hospitals in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

Thokoe Vincent Makola, Mirabel Kah-Keh Nanjoh, Ntandazo Dlatu, Guillermo-Alfredo Pulido-Estrada, Siyonela Mlonyeni, Linda Jessica Sobekwa, Bomkazi Majeke
article en

Abstract

<ns5:p>Background Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are essential evidence-based tools for safe, effective, high-quality healthcare, yet evidence on their availability, accessibility, implementation, and perceived effectiveness in South African district teaching hospitals remains limited. This study evaluated these domains and barriers to CPG use among healthcare professionals in two district teaching hospitals in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Methods A facility-based cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured, self-administered questionnaire assessing CPG availability, accessibility, implementation, perceived effectiveness, and implementation barriers. Descriptive statistics summarized participant characteristics and responses, while independent-samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA examined differences in composite domain scores across participant characteristics. Results A total of 169 healthcare professionals participated (response rate: 73.8%); 76.3% were female and 79.9% were nurses. Overall, 71.0% reported that CPGs were available in their facilities and 72.2% considered them relevant to the local disease burden, but only 44.3% believed guidelines were updated regularly. Printed hard copies (30.2%) and multiple access methods (26.7%) predominated, whereas digital resources (8.1%) and mobile applications (9.3%) were infrequently used; 7.0% reported no access. Frequent CPG use (80.5%) and confidence in applying guidelines (88.8%) were high, although only 53.9% reported adequate training. Participants perceived CPGs as highly effective in improving patient outcomes (98.8%), reducing clinical errors (97.0%), and enhancing quality of care (95.3%). Principal implementation barriers were inadequate resources (85.8%), staff shortages (76.9%), and insufficient training (72.2%). Conclusions CPGs were generally available, widely used, and perceived as highly effective in supporting evidence-based care in district teaching hospitals. However, gaps remain in guideline updating, equitable access, digital availability, and healthcare worker training. Strengthening institutional support through regular revision, expanded digital access, adequate resourcing, and continuous professional development may enhance CPG implementation and sustainability in resource-constrained settings.</ns5:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Walter Sisulu University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.