Validating Online Guidance for Reusability Flight Experiment: Genetic Programming and Reinforcement Learning
In this study, two machine learning (ML) techniques—genetic programming (GP) and deep reinforcement learning (DRL)—are leveraged to derive a reentry guidance law and are evaluated using a high-fidelity six-degree-of-freedom simulator developed for validating the Reusability Flight Experiment (ReFEx) vehicle guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) subsystem. Both methods are benchmarked against each other and against the baseline ReFEx optimization-based guidance strategy to assess their applicability to a real mission and to understand their respective strengths and weaknesses. The ReFEx mission focuses on the reentry phase, wherein GP and DRL models are applied to generate real-time corrections to precomputed reference guidance commands, thereby compensating for external disturbances and model inaccuracies. GP is selected for its ability to produce human-readable, continuous, and differentiable models that yield smooth guidance commands, whereas DRL employs a fully connected neural network (NN), delivering superior performance at the expense of a black-box model and nonsmooth guidance signals. The results demonstrate that DRL and GP achieve performance comparable to the mission baseline guidance, hence validating their applicability in mission-grade applications. Moreover, both ML approaches achieve faster online execution times than the baseline guidance method.
Authors
- Francesco Marchetti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4552-0467)
- Jose Luis Redondo Gutiérrez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0037-2299)
- David Seelbinder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4080-3169)
- Riccardo Cadamuro
Institutions
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics
- Published
- 2026-08-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g009727
- Primary Topic
- Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00