Propolis-containing formulations in caries prevention - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical efficacy of propolis-containing formulations (PCFs) in preventing dental caries (PROSPERO: CRD420251246707). METHODS: This study adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Systematic database searches were conducted (December 11, 2025) without language or date restrictions. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing PCFs (dentifrices, mouthwashes, tablets, etc.) for caries-related outcomes compared with negative control or chlorhexidine-containing formulations (CHX). Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated using random-effects models. Meta-analyses were conducted for the outcomes plaque index (PI) and microbial counts in saliva or biofilm (MC). RoB 2 tool and GRADE were used as quality assessment tools. RESULTS: Of 1,919 identified records, 45 studies were included. Direct caries-related outcomes (caries indices) were rarely assessed and unsuitable for meta-analysis. PCFs significantly reduced PI compared with negative control (SMD[95% CI]: -1.11 [-1.52, -0.70], p < 0.01) and showed no significant difference compared with CHX (0.46 [-0.04, 0.95], p = 0.07). Similar patterns were observed for MC (PFCs vs. negative control (-1.45 [-2.43, -0.48], p = 0.004; PFCs vs. CHX: 0.38 [-0.11, 0.87], p = 0.13). Certainty of evidence was very low due to high risk of bias, inconsistency and indirectness. CONCLUSION: Propolis-containing formulations may reduce plaque indices and oral microbial counts, suggesting a potential role in caries prevention. However, high-quality studies assessing direct caries outcomes are needed to properly address the research question. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Propolis-containing formulations are widely available and well accepted by patients. Clinicians may consider them as adjuncts to oral biofilm control but the evidence directly supporting their clinical efficacy in caries prevention is still not well established.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/100254
Primary Topic
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Propolis-containing formulations in caries prevention - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thiago Saads Carvalho, Richard Johannes Wierichs, Samira Helena Niemeyer, Letícia Oba Sakae et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
article

Propolis-containing formulations in caries prevention - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Thiago Saads Carvalho, Richard Johannes Wierichs, Samira Helena Niemeyer, Letícia Oba Sakae, Luciana Pisenti Berto
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical efficacy of propolis-containing formulations (PCFs) in preventing dental caries (PROSPERO: CRD420251246707). METHODS: This study adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Systematic database searches were conducted (December 11, 2025) without language or date restrictions. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing PCFs (dentifrices, mouthwashes, tablets, etc.) for caries-related outcomes compared with negative control or chlorhexidine-containing formulations (CHX). Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated using random-effects models. Meta-analyses were conducted for the outcomes plaque index (PI) and microbial counts in saliva or biofilm (MC). RoB 2 tool and GRADE were used as quality assessment tools. RESULTS: Of 1,919 identified records, 45 studies were included. Direct caries-related outcomes (caries indices) were rarely assessed and unsuitable for meta-analysis. PCFs significantly reduced PI compared with negative control (SMD[95% CI]: -1.11 [-1.52, -0.70], p < 0.01) and showed no significant difference compared with CHX (0.46 [-0.04, 0.95], p = 0.07). Similar patterns were observed for MC (PFCs vs. negative control (-1.45 [-2.43, -0.48], p = 0.004; PFCs vs. CHX: 0.38 [-0.11, 0.87], p = 0.13). Certainty of evidence was very low due to high risk of bias, inconsistency and indirectness. CONCLUSION: Propolis-containing formulations may reduce plaque indices and oral microbial counts, suggesting a potential role in caries prevention. However, high-quality studies assessing direct caries outcomes are needed to properly address the research question. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Propolis-containing formulations are widely available and well accepted by patients. Clinicians may consider them as adjuncts to oral biofilm control but the evidence directly supporting their clinical efficacy in caries prevention is still not well established.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
General Department of Preventive Medicine (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.