Time toxicity in patients receiving brachytherapy and hormonal therapy for recurrent prostate cancer: a cohort study

OBJECTIVES: Time toxicity-the time patients spend receiving treatment and associated care-is an increasingly recognised burden of cancer treatment. Literature has largely relied on calendar-day-based measurement, which may obscure meaningful variation in time burden. This study aimed to quantify time toxicity with greater granularity by measuring it in hours. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with recurrent prostate cancer enrolled in a clinical trial of concurrent high-dose-rate brachytherapy and hormonal therapy at a tertiary cancer centre in Canada. Electronic medical records were reviewed for 180 days following treatment initiation. Time toxicity was quantified as median days and median hours per month spent in care. Subgroup analyses were conducted by encounter type. Sensitivity analyses incorporated the estimated travel time. Type I error was 0.05. RESULTS: 46 patients were included. Patients had a median of 6 healthcare encounters: 3 in Month 1, with the remaining 3 distributed across the following 5 months. Early encounters were predominantly treatment-related, whereas later encounters were largely monitoring or follow-up appointments. The median time toxicity was 13.7 hours over 6 months following treatment initiation, with 10.9 hours occurring in Month 1 and minimal time in subsequent months. Planned, in-person encounters accounted for nearly all toxicity. Incorporating travel time more than doubled time toxicity in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Time toxicity was front-loaded and driven primarily by planned, in-person care. Expressing time toxicity in hours provided clearer quantification of early time burden. More granular, patient-centred measurement of time toxicity should be prioritised in future cancer trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2026-006361
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time toxicity in patients receiving brachytherapy and hormonal therapy for recurrent prostate cancer: a cohort study

Jennifer Leigh, Georgia Catherine Richards, Camilla Zimmermann, Sarah Bayrakdarian et al.
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Time toxicity in patients receiving brachytherapy and hormonal therapy for recurrent prostate cancer: a cohort study

Jennifer Leigh, Georgia Catherine Richards, Camilla Zimmermann, Sarah Bayrakdarian, Hans Chung, Ronald Chow, Carl Heneghan
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Time toxicity-the time patients spend receiving treatment and associated care-is an increasingly recognised burden of cancer treatment. Literature has largely relied on calendar-day-based measurement, which may obscure meaningful variation in time burden. This study aimed to quantify time toxicity with greater granularity by measuring it in hours. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with recurrent prostate cancer enrolled in a clinical trial of concurrent high-dose-rate brachytherapy and hormonal therapy at a tertiary cancer centre in Canada. Electronic medical records were reviewed for 180 days following treatment initiation. Time toxicity was quantified as median days and median hours per month spent in care. Subgroup analyses were conducted by encounter type. Sensitivity analyses incorporated the estimated travel time. Type I error was 0.05. RESULTS: 46 patients were included. Patients had a median of 6 healthcare encounters: 3 in Month 1, with the remaining 3 distributed across the following 5 months. Early encounters were predominantly treatment-related, whereas later encounters were largely monitoring or follow-up appointments. The median time toxicity was 13.7 hours over 6 months following treatment initiation, with 10.9 hours occurring in Month 1 and minimal time in subsequent months. Planned, in-person encounters accounted for nearly all toxicity. Incorporating travel time more than doubled time toxicity in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Time toxicity was front-loaded and driven primarily by planned, in-person care. Expressing time toxicity in hours provided clearer quantification of early time burden. More granular, patient-centred measurement of time toxicity should be prioritised in future cancer trials.

BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), King's College London (GB), University of Toronto (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), University of Oxford (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.