Ancient apocalypse now: Lessons from pseudoscience in the Pacific in the face of GenAI

Generative AI (GenAI) and misinformation online have the potential to cause harm to Indigenous cultural knowledge advancement and truth-telling endeavours. Indigenous archaeologies in Australia and the Pacific Islands are no strangers to misinformation produced from pseudoarchaeology or fringe narratives; however, the new potential threats posed by GenAI in (re)popularising false histories and the loss of scientific and Indigenous authority are of great concern. Here we examine the current state of information generation using ChatGPT by querying well-known pseudoarchaeology narratives from the Pacific Islands and Australia. We do not wish to conflate GenAI with pseudoarchaeology; rather, our aim is to test and assess whether GenAI can distinguish current archaeological and Indigenous knowledge from fringe narratives. Further, we consider the intersections between GenAI ethics, the complex legacies of archaeological knowledge history and Indigenous cultural and intellectual property (ICIP). These require active attention to advance ethical research practices and combat the dissemination of misinformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Archaeology
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03122417.2026.2706246
Primary Topic
Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ancient apocalypse now: Lessons from pseudoscience in the Pacific in the face of GenAI

Andrea Ballesteros - Danel, Michelle Richards, Hilary Howes, T. Llechid Jones et al.
Australian Archaeology
Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
article

Ancient apocalypse now: Lessons from pseudoscience in the Pacific in the face of GenAI

Andrea Ballesteros - Danel, Michelle Richards, Hilary Howes, T. Llechid Jones, Émilie Dotte-Sarout
article en

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) and misinformation online have the potential to cause harm to Indigenous cultural knowledge advancement and truth-telling endeavours. Indigenous archaeologies in Australia and the Pacific Islands are no strangers to misinformation produced from pseudoarchaeology or fringe narratives; however, the new potential threats posed by GenAI in (re)popularising false histories and the loss of scientific and Indigenous authority are of great concern. Here we examine the current state of information generation using ChatGPT by querying well-known pseudoarchaeology narratives from the Pacific Islands and Australia. We do not wish to conflate GenAI with pseudoarchaeology; rather, our aim is to test and assess whether GenAI can distinguish current archaeological and Indigenous knowledge from fringe narratives. Further, we consider the intersections between GenAI ethics, the complex legacies of archaeological knowledge history and Indigenous cultural and intellectual property (ICIP). These require active attention to advance ethical research practices and combat the dissemination of misinformation.

Australian Archaeology
Australian National University (AU), National Museum of Australia (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Futures Group (United States) (US), Film Independent (US)
Australian National University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ancient apocalypse now: Lessons from pseudoscience in the Pacific in the face of GenAI — Andrea Ballesteros - Danel, Michelle Richards, et al. · Australian Archaeology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS