Validating the Virtue Ethics Measurement Scale Within an Open Distance e-Learning Higher Education Institution in South Africa: Students’ Perspectives of Generative AI Practices

Generative AI (GenAI) adoption in higher education (HE) raises significant ethical concerns. The focus is shifting from rules- or outcomes-based learning environments towards the development of moral character, personality traits, integrity, and practical wisdom (phronesis). However, most existing AI ethics validation instruments are predominantly shaped by Global North paradigms. In Global South HE contexts, in particular, open distance e-learning (ODEL) HE institutions (HEIs) characterised by limited direct supervision and a digital divide, validation remains scant. Ethical risks are intensified by the adoption and integration of GenAI tools, such as large language models (LLMs), to enhance teaching, learning, research, and student support, thus recognising the need to develop and validate virtue ethics scales. The current paper attempts to address this gap by validating the Virtue Ethics Measurement Scale (VEMS) within South Africa’s largest comprehensive ODEL institution. Guided by the positivist paradigm, a 36-item cross-sectional survey of 503 undergraduate and postgraduate students measured six virtue dimensions (justice, honesty, responsibility, care, prudence, and fortitude). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) compared four competing models. The single-factor model showed poor fit, rejecting unidimensionality. A second-order hierarchical model demonstrated an acceptable fit (χ2/df = 2.992, CFI = 0.933, RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation) = 0.063, SRMR (Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual) = 0.043) with subscale reliabilities ranging from Cronbach’s α = 0.84 to 0.90, supporting a multidimensional yet hierarchical virtue structure. The VEMS offers a psychometrically sound instrument for evaluating ethical AI use in ODEL institutions. This aligns with virtue ethics theory, which emphasises that moral character is a constellation of dispositions (e.g., honesty, care, prudence) rather than a single trait. The VEMS thus enables HEIs to assess students’ virtues, design targeted ethics capacity-development programmes, and inform policy reform for responsible GenAI adoption in under-researched Global South HE settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algorithms
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/a19080682
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating the Virtue Ethics Measurement Scale Within an Open Distance e-Learning Higher Education Institution in South Africa: Students’ Perspectives of Generative AI Practices

Robert Nicky Tjano, Leonie B. Louw, Retha Visagie, Carine Prinsloo et al.
Algorithms
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Validating the Virtue Ethics Measurement Scale Within an Open Distance e-Learning Higher Education Institution in South Africa: Students’ Perspectives of Generative AI Practices

Robert Nicky Tjano, Leonie B. Louw, Retha Visagie, Carine Prinsloo, Dion van Zyl, Motlokwe Calvin Thobejane, Ramashego Shila Mphahlele, Phindiwe Jeanette Kamolane
article en

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) adoption in higher education (HE) raises significant ethical concerns. The focus is shifting from rules- or outcomes-based learning environments towards the development of moral character, personality traits, integrity, and practical wisdom (phronesis). However, most existing AI ethics validation instruments are predominantly shaped by Global North paradigms. In Global South HE contexts, in particular, open distance e-learning (ODEL) HE institutions (HEIs) characterised by limited direct supervision and a digital divide, validation remains scant. Ethical risks are intensified by the adoption and integration of GenAI tools, such as large language models (LLMs), to enhance teaching, learning, research, and student support, thus recognising the need to develop and validate virtue ethics scales. The current paper attempts to address this gap by validating the Virtue Ethics Measurement Scale (VEMS) within South Africa’s largest comprehensive ODEL institution. Guided by the positivist paradigm, a 36-item cross-sectional survey of 503 undergraduate and postgraduate students measured six virtue dimensions (justice, honesty, responsibility, care, prudence, and fortitude). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) compared four competing models. The single-factor model showed poor fit, rejecting unidimensionality. A second-order hierarchical model demonstrated an acceptable fit (χ2/df = 2.992, CFI = 0.933, RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation) = 0.063, SRMR (Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual) = 0.043) with subscale reliabilities ranging from Cronbach’s α = 0.84 to 0.90, supporting a multidimensional yet hierarchical virtue structure. The VEMS offers a psychometrically sound instrument for evaluating ethical AI use in ODEL institutions. This aligns with virtue ethics theory, which emphasises that moral character is a constellation of dispositions (e.g., honesty, care, prudence) rather than a single trait. The VEMS thus enables HEIs to assess students’ virtues, design targeted ethics capacity-development programmes, and inform policy reform for responsible GenAI adoption in under-researched Global South HE settings.

AlgorithmsVol. 19(8)
Human Sciences Research Council (ZA), University of South Africa (ZA), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.