Safety Signals in Telehealth Primary Care and Outpatient Settings: Incident and Reporting Analysis Using World Health Organization Classification

OBJECTIVES: Patient safety in primary health care remains understudied compared with hospital settings, with particularly scarce comparative evidence on incident profiles across outpatient and telehealth modalities. This study addresses these gaps by characterizing safety signals and reporting dynamics in a Brazilian supplementary health program. METHODS: This observational, retrospective study analyzed incident notifications from an institutional reporting system (January 2019 to October 2024), adhering to EQUATOR and STROBE guidelines. Incidents were classified using the World Health Organization International Classification for Patient Safety. Distributions of incident types, harm severity, reporter categories, and adverse events between outpatient and telehealth settings were compared using the χ2 or Fisher exact tests, with associations quantified through univariable logistic regression as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 3,287 incidents, telehealth reports were dominated by infrastructure (46.0%) and behavioral (36.0%) issues, while outpatient reports emphasized clinical processes/procedures (25.7%) and medication events (17.8%; P<0.001). Telehealth reports were more concentrated in risk circumstances and less often classified as near misses, incidents without harm, mild adverse events, or adverse events, with no significant difference in moderate or severe adverse events. Nurses submitted significantly more telehealth than outpatient reports (85.1% vs. 38.3%; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Telehealth and outpatient primary care have distinct safety profiles shaped by differences in incident type, report behavior, and care context. A one-size-fits-all approach is inadequate -while institutional interventions can quickly shift reporting culture, lasting improvement requires modality-specific strategies. Policymakers should adopt tailored safety frameworks for both virtual and outpatient care to translate reporting gains into real harm reduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient Safety
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000001553
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety Signals in Telehealth Primary Care and Outpatient Settings: Incident and Reporting Analysis Using World Health Organization Classification

Alessandra M. Campos-Staffico, Gabriela B. Togashi, Daiane A. Dias, Bárbara M. Lima et al.
Journal of Patient Safety
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Safety Signals in Telehealth Primary Care and Outpatient Settings: Incident and Reporting Analysis Using World Health Organization Classification

Alessandra M. Campos-Staffico, Gabriela B. Togashi, Daiane A. Dias, Bárbara M. Lima, Douglas P. Silva, Camila N. Monteiro
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patient safety in primary health care remains understudied compared with hospital settings, with particularly scarce comparative evidence on incident profiles across outpatient and telehealth modalities. This study addresses these gaps by characterizing safety signals and reporting dynamics in a Brazilian supplementary health program. METHODS: This observational, retrospective study analyzed incident notifications from an institutional reporting system (January 2019 to October 2024), adhering to EQUATOR and STROBE guidelines. Incidents were classified using the World Health Organization International Classification for Patient Safety. Distributions of incident types, harm severity, reporter categories, and adverse events between outpatient and telehealth settings were compared using the χ2 or Fisher exact tests, with associations quantified through univariable logistic regression as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 3,287 incidents, telehealth reports were dominated by infrastructure (46.0%) and behavioral (36.0%) issues, while outpatient reports emphasized clinical processes/procedures (25.7%) and medication events (17.8%; P<0.001). Telehealth reports were more concentrated in risk circumstances and less often classified as near misses, incidents without harm, mild adverse events, or adverse events, with no significant difference in moderate or severe adverse events. Nurses submitted significantly more telehealth than outpatient reports (85.1% vs. 38.3%; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Telehealth and outpatient primary care have distinct safety profiles shaped by differences in incident type, report behavior, and care context. A one-size-fits-all approach is inadequate -while institutional interventions can quickly shift reporting culture, lasting improvement requires modality-specific strategies. Policymakers should adopt tailored safety frameworks for both virtual and outpatient care to translate reporting gains into real harm reduction.

Journal of Patient Safety
Creighton University (US), Hospital Sírio-Libanês (BR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.