Why Consider Separate Adherence Domains? Data From a 12‐Week Workplace Lifestyle Program in Taiwan: A Single‐Arm Real‐World Cohort Study

ABSTRACT Background Workplace lifestyle programs are increasingly used for early cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic prevention but are commonly evaluated as whole packages. Whether distinct adherence domains within a multimodal program are associated with different short‐term health responses remains unclear. Methods We conducted a single‐arm, retrospective, real‐world cohort study of the Enhancing Lifestyles and Nutritional Domains Intervention Activation (ELANDIA) 12‐Week Life Challenge in a hospital‐based community in Taiwan. Adults with complete paired baseline and 12‐week assessments were included. The intervention integrated five lifestyle pillars: healthy diet, physical activity, stress management, restorative sleep, and social connection. Adherence was quantified as 8000‐step goal adherence, curriculum participation, and daily task completion. Primary outcomes were body weight, lifestyle medicine assessment (LMA) total score, and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) total score. Adjusted within‐participant changes were estimated using linear mixed‐effects models; time‐by‐adherence interactions explored adherence‐domain differentiation. Findings Among 151 participants, mean age was 38.93 years (standard deviation [SD] 8.54), 25 (16.6%) were male, and 103 (68.2%) were hospital employees. At 12 weeks, body weight decreased by 3.51 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] −4.06 to −2.95), body mass index (BMI) by 1.34 kg/m 2 (−1.53 to −1.15), and waist circumference by 3.42 cm (−3.94 to −2.90). LMA total score increased by 6.83 points (5.71–7.96), and HADS total score decreased by 4.59 points (−5.33 to −3.85; all p < 0.001). Exploratory analyses showed that step‐goal adherence was associated with changes in seven of eight adiposity outcomes, whereas curriculum participation and task completion were selectively associated with diastolic blood pressure reduction and LMA improvement. Interpretation In this hospital‐based workplace cohort, multiple outcomes improved during the 12‐week program, with exploratory differences across adherence domains. High‐resolution adherence tracking may identify candidate engagement patterns for prospective evaluation. Controlled studies with longer follow‐up are needed to assess durability and causal effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lifestyle Medicine
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lim2.70072
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Consider Separate Adherence Domains? Data From a 12‐Week Workplace Lifestyle Program in Taiwan: A Single‐Arm Real‐World Cohort Study

Szu‐Yuan Wu, Chun-Sheng Ho, Yi-Chiun Yang, Hao Hsu et al.
Lifestyle Medicine
Physical Activity and Health
article

Why Consider Separate Adherence Domains? Data From a 12‐Week Workplace Lifestyle Program in Taiwan: A Single‐Arm Real‐World Cohort Study

Szu‐Yuan Wu, Chun-Sheng Ho, Yi-Chiun Yang, Hao Hsu, Wan‐Ming Chen, Wenling Hsu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Workplace lifestyle programs are increasingly used for early cardiovascular–kidney–metabolic prevention but are commonly evaluated as whole packages. Whether distinct adherence domains within a multimodal program are associated with different short‐term health responses remains unclear. Methods We conducted a single‐arm, retrospective, real‐world cohort study of the Enhancing Lifestyles and Nutritional Domains Intervention Activation (ELANDIA) 12‐Week Life Challenge in a hospital‐based community in Taiwan. Adults with complete paired baseline and 12‐week assessments were included. The intervention integrated five lifestyle pillars: healthy diet, physical activity, stress management, restorative sleep, and social connection. Adherence was quantified as 8000‐step goal adherence, curriculum participation, and daily task completion. Primary outcomes were body weight, lifestyle medicine assessment (LMA) total score, and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) total score. Adjusted within‐participant changes were estimated using linear mixed‐effects models; time‐by‐adherence interactions explored adherence‐domain differentiation. Findings Among 151 participants, mean age was 38.93 years (standard deviation [SD] 8.54), 25 (16.6%) were male, and 103 (68.2%) were hospital employees. At 12 weeks, body weight decreased by 3.51 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] −4.06 to −2.95), body mass index (BMI) by 1.34 kg/m 2 (−1.53 to −1.15), and waist circumference by 3.42 cm (−3.94 to −2.90). LMA total score increased by 6.83 points (5.71–7.96), and HADS total score decreased by 4.59 points (−5.33 to −3.85; all p < 0.001). Exploratory analyses showed that step‐goal adherence was associated with changes in seven of eight adiposity outcomes, whereas curriculum participation and task completion were selectively associated with diastolic blood pressure reduction and LMA improvement. Interpretation In this hospital‐based workplace cohort, multiple outcomes improved during the 12‐week program, with exploratory differences across adherence domains. High‐resolution adherence tracking may identify candidate engagement patterns for prospective evaluation. Controlled studies with longer follow‐up are needed to assess durability and causal effects.

Lifestyle MedicineVol. 7(4)
Asia University (TW), Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital (TW), Ministry of Health and Welfare (TW), Wan Fang Hospital (TW)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.