Leading Beyond the Algorithm: Empowering Faculty, Protecting Inclusion, and Reclaiming Leadership Legitimacy in AI-Driven Higher Education

What happens to faculty autonomy, student learning, inclusion, accountability, and leadership legitimacy when AI can perform substantial portions of academic work? This presentation examines that question through recent empirical research and develops a five-part higher education leadership framework focused on: ▪️ Faculty autonomy▪️ Learning integrity▪️ Equitable participation▪️ Institutional accountability▪️ Leadership legitimacy The central argument is clear: AI can assist academic work, but it should not determine the purposes, standards, responsibilities, or values of higher education. The presentation offers a framework for examining AI adoption through a higher education leadership lens and provides recommendations for faculty empowerment, student learning, inclusion, AI literacy, accountability, and institutional decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21936734
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leading Beyond the Algorithm: Empowering Faculty, Protecting Inclusion, and Reclaiming Leadership Legitimacy in AI-Driven Higher Education

Mopelola Fatile
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Leading Beyond the Algorithm: Empowering Faculty, Protecting Inclusion, and Reclaiming Leadership Legitimacy in AI-Driven Higher Education

Mopelola Fatile
article en

Abstract

What happens to faculty autonomy, student learning, inclusion, accountability, and leadership legitimacy when AI can perform substantial portions of academic work? This presentation examines that question through recent empirical research and develops a five-part higher education leadership framework focused on: ▪️ Faculty autonomy▪️ Learning integrity▪️ Equitable participation▪️ Institutional accountability▪️ Leadership legitimacy The central argument is clear: AI can assist academic work, but it should not determine the purposes, standards, responsibilities, or values of higher education. The presentation offers a framework for examining AI adoption through a higher education leadership lens and provides recommendations for faculty empowerment, student learning, inclusion, AI literacy, accountability, and institutional decision-making.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Grand Canyon University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.