Personalized medicine in diabetology: why C-peptide standardization is essential for translating research into clinical practice

Abstract Personalized medicine has advanced in diabetology over the past decade. Diabetes is diagnosed based on measures of glycaemia, i.e. glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) and glucose, and the classification distinguishes type 1, type 2, gestational diabetes, and specific forms. Especially type 2 diabetes has clinically long been recognized as a heterogeneous metabolic disorder driven by diverse pathophysiological mechanisms. Data-driven approaches have identified distinct sub-phenotypes, offering a more nuanced understanding of diabetes and prediabetes heterogeneity. Identified subgroups differ in clinical characteristics, the risk of disease progression and developing long term complications. Implementing pathophysiology-based classification and emerging therapeutic decision tools requires additional laboratory biomarkers to estimate beta-cell function and insulin resistance. Fasting C-peptide has emerged as the most informative and broadly applicable biomarker and analytical comparability between laboratories has become a prerequisite for translating research findings into guidelines and clinical practice. Efforts to standardize C-peptide measurement have shown that results from different laboratories and assay manufacturers vary widely, even when using the same WHO reference material. Studies consistently demonstrate that recalibrating assays with serum-based, matrix-appropriate reference samples – rather than pure reference reagents – greatly improves agreement across methods. Although a full reference measurement system is now available, significant variability persists and broad implementation remains incomplete despite compelling evidence supporting its effectiveness. The remaining challenge is therefore no longer the development of appropriate reference materials or analytical procedures, but their consistent implementation across manufacturers. Addressing this final step is essential for enabling personalized diabetes care and will ultimately benefit both patients and manufacturers by improving clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2026-0113
Primary Topic
Diabetes and associated disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personalized medicine in diabetology: why C-peptide standardization is essential for translating research into clinical practice

Andreas Peter, Marija Kocijančić, Erwin Schleicher, Martin Heni
Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Diabetes and associated disorders
article

Personalized medicine in diabetology: why C-peptide standardization is essential for translating research into clinical practice

Andreas Peter, Marija Kocijančić, Erwin Schleicher, Martin Heni
article en

Abstract

Abstract Personalized medicine has advanced in diabetology over the past decade. Diabetes is diagnosed based on measures of glycaemia, i.e. glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) and glucose, and the classification distinguishes type 1, type 2, gestational diabetes, and specific forms. Especially type 2 diabetes has clinically long been recognized as a heterogeneous metabolic disorder driven by diverse pathophysiological mechanisms. Data-driven approaches have identified distinct sub-phenotypes, offering a more nuanced understanding of diabetes and prediabetes heterogeneity. Identified subgroups differ in clinical characteristics, the risk of disease progression and developing long term complications. Implementing pathophysiology-based classification and emerging therapeutic decision tools requires additional laboratory biomarkers to estimate beta-cell function and insulin resistance. Fasting C-peptide has emerged as the most informative and broadly applicable biomarker and analytical comparability between laboratories has become a prerequisite for translating research findings into guidelines and clinical practice. Efforts to standardize C-peptide measurement have shown that results from different laboratories and assay manufacturers vary widely, even when using the same WHO reference material. Studies consistently demonstrate that recalibrating assays with serum-based, matrix-appropriate reference samples – rather than pure reference reagents – greatly improves agreement across methods. Although a full reference measurement system is now available, significant variability persists and broad implementation remains incomplete despite compelling evidence supporting its effectiveness. The remaining challenge is therefore no longer the development of appropriate reference materials or analytical procedures, but their consistent implementation across manufacturers. Addressing this final step is essential for enabling personalized diabetes care and will ultimately benefit both patients and manufacturers by improving clinical decision-making.

Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE), German Center for Diabetes Research (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Diabetes and associated disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.