Robust periocular authentication in HMD environments using multi‐template fusion strategies

Abstract Periocular authentication in head‐mounted display (HMD) environments is challenged by substantial intra‐class variability caused by gaze shifts, blinking, facial expressions, and HMD‐specific imaging artifacts. Such variability limits the reliability of single‐template verification. We present a robust periocular authentication framework and systematically compare multi‐template selection and fusion strategies to address this problem. Our method integrates eye‐region segmentation, gaze estimation, and geometric normalization to support reliable matching in HMD settings. We evaluate basic fusion rules and weighted fusion using template quality and query‐template similarity. Experiments on the AffectiVR dataset show that multi‐template strategies substantially improve upon the single‐template baseline, with the best weighted fusion strategy achieving 1.22% equal error rate (EER) with 16 templates, a 71% relative reduction from the baseline EER of 4.19%. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of multi‐template strategies for robust HMD periocular authentication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ETRI Journal
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2025-0459
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust periocular authentication in HMD environments using multi‐template fusion strategies

Youngsam Kim, Jong‐hyuk Roh, Soohyung Kim
ETRI Journal
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
article

Robust periocular authentication in HMD environments using multi‐template fusion strategies

Youngsam Kim, Jong‐hyuk Roh, Soohyung Kim
article en

Abstract

Abstract Periocular authentication in head‐mounted display (HMD) environments is challenged by substantial intra‐class variability caused by gaze shifts, blinking, facial expressions, and HMD‐specific imaging artifacts. Such variability limits the reliability of single‐template verification. We present a robust periocular authentication framework and systematically compare multi‐template selection and fusion strategies to address this problem. Our method integrates eye‐region segmentation, gaze estimation, and geometric normalization to support reliable matching in HMD settings. We evaluate basic fusion rules and weighted fusion using template quality and query‐template similarity. Experiments on the AffectiVR dataset show that multi‐template strategies substantially improve upon the single‐template baseline, with the best weighted fusion strategy achieving 1.22% equal error rate (EER) with 16 templates, a 71% relative reduction from the baseline EER of 4.19%. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of multi‐template strategies for robust HMD periocular authentication.

ETRI Journal
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.