Quantifying the Asymmetric Socioeconomic Burden of Residential Electricity Tariffs: The Energy-Economic Impact Index Framework

Residential electricity tariff structures in emerging economies are often highly complex, dynamically combining regional climatic variables and multi-tiered price adjustments. In Mexico, despite a preferential scheme designed to mitigate seasonal expenditure fluctuations, baseline energy subsidies frequently fail to protect low-income households due to structural targeting inefficiencies based strictly on regional temperature thresholds rather than socioeconomic status. This study addresses this methodological and regulatory gap by developing the Energy-Economic Impact Index (EEII), a novel mathematical and heuristic framework that couples complex Increasing Block Tariffs (IBT) architecture with localized household income dynamics at the state level. The proposed methodology was comprehensively validated using synchronized biennial empirical datasets from all 32 Mexican states, combining Federal Electricity Commission (CFE) billing data and National Surveys of Household Income and Expenditures (ENIGH) spanning the 2018–2024 period. Quantitative results reveal a severe, non-linear escalation of the financial energy burden across the territory, demonstrating that rising residential electricity costs significantly outpaced domestic income growth trajectories. Notably, households situated within high-temperature geographic regimes (Tariffs 1D, 1E, and 1F) exhibited the most critical economic vulnerability, with the calculated energy cost impact absorbing up to 14.90% of the real monthly household income in 2024. Ultimately, the EEII framework proves to be a robust predictive and decision-support tool for energy policy planners aiming to optimize fiscal subsidy allocation, reduce energy poverty gaps, and mitigate socioeconomic risks in transition economies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19163811
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the Asymmetric Socioeconomic Burden of Residential Electricity Tariffs: The Energy-Economic Impact Index Framework

Carlos Rubio-Maya, Xiomara González-Ramírez, Iván Abel Hernández-Robles, Alejandro Pizano-Martínez et al.
Energies
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Quantifying the Asymmetric Socioeconomic Burden of Residential Electricity Tariffs: The Energy-Economic Impact Index Framework

Carlos Rubio-Maya, Xiomara González-Ramírez, Iván Abel Hernández-Robles, Alejandro Pizano-Martínez, José M. Lozano, Jesús Martínez Patiño
article en

Abstract

Residential electricity tariff structures in emerging economies are often highly complex, dynamically combining regional climatic variables and multi-tiered price adjustments. In Mexico, despite a preferential scheme designed to mitigate seasonal expenditure fluctuations, baseline energy subsidies frequently fail to protect low-income households due to structural targeting inefficiencies based strictly on regional temperature thresholds rather than socioeconomic status. This study addresses this methodological and regulatory gap by developing the Energy-Economic Impact Index (EEII), a novel mathematical and heuristic framework that couples complex Increasing Block Tariffs (IBT) architecture with localized household income dynamics at the state level. The proposed methodology was comprehensively validated using synchronized biennial empirical datasets from all 32 Mexican states, combining Federal Electricity Commission (CFE) billing data and National Surveys of Household Income and Expenditures (ENIGH) spanning the 2018–2024 period. Quantitative results reveal a severe, non-linear escalation of the financial energy burden across the territory, demonstrating that rising residential electricity costs significantly outpaced domestic income growth trajectories. Notably, households situated within high-temperature geographic regimes (Tariffs 1D, 1E, and 1F) exhibited the most critical economic vulnerability, with the calculated energy cost impact absorbing up to 14.90% of the real monthly household income in 2024. Ultimately, the EEII framework proves to be a robust predictive and decision-support tool for energy policy planners aiming to optimize fiscal subsidy allocation, reduce energy poverty gaps, and mitigate socioeconomic risks in transition economies.

EnergiesVol. 19(16)
Universidad de Guanajuato (MX), Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo (MX)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.