Modeling Automation Trust Diffusion in Teams: Linking Micro- and Macro-Trust Dynamics

ObjectiveWe develop a dynamic model to understand how trust in automation evolves within teams through team member interactions, assessing whether trust converges or diverges over time.BackgroundExisting research assumes that individual and team trust in automation converges over time, but these studies typically last only hours or days. This assumption may not hold for long-duration missions, like deep space exploration, where team dynamics and trust might evolve in a contingent rather than convergent manner. Contingent behavior evolves towards different endpoints based on small perturbations, whereas convergent behavior evolves to similar endpoints.MethodsWe developed a stochastic, discrete-event agent-based trust dynamics model that goes beyond existing models that only consider past interactions with automation. Our model incorporates team conversations, individual automation experience, and turn-taking interactions.ResultsConsistent with human subjects data, the model showed divergent trust behavior where team members' trust levels did not converge to similar values over time.ConclusionsDynamical models of trust in teams can show contingent behavior. Trust in automation within and across teams can diverge, indicating a new mechanism for trust dynamics. Trust calibration strategies should address potential divergence.ApplicationsDesigners should consider the divergence of trust within and between teams, especially for long-duration missions. Methods to calibrate trust in this situation may include structured debriefs or shared automation feedback displays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
2026-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261472131
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Automation Trust Diffusion in Teams: Linking Micro- and Macro-Trust Dynamics

John D. Lee, Vianney Renata
Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Modeling Automation Trust Diffusion in Teams: Linking Micro- and Macro-Trust Dynamics

John D. Lee, Vianney Renata
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveWe develop a dynamic model to understand how trust in automation evolves within teams through team member interactions, assessing whether trust converges or diverges over time.BackgroundExisting research assumes that individual and team trust in automation converges over time, but these studies typically last only hours or days. This assumption may not hold for long-duration missions, like deep space exploration, where team dynamics and trust might evolve in a contingent rather than convergent manner. Contingent behavior evolves towards different endpoints based on small perturbations, whereas convergent behavior evolves to similar endpoints.MethodsWe developed a stochastic, discrete-event agent-based trust dynamics model that goes beyond existing models that only consider past interactions with automation. Our model incorporates team conversations, individual automation experience, and turn-taking interactions.ResultsConsistent with human subjects data, the model showed divergent trust behavior where team members' trust levels did not converge to similar values over time.ConclusionsDynamical models of trust in teams can show contingent behavior. Trust in automation within and across teams can diverge, indicating a new mechanism for trust dynamics. Trust calibration strategies should address potential divergence.ApplicationsDesigners should consider the divergence of trust within and between teams, especially for long-duration missions. Methods to calibrate trust in this situation may include structured debriefs or shared automation feedback displays.

Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.