The LGBTQ+ Communication Sciences and Disorders Student Association Climate Survey

Purpose: The purpose of the survey was to understand the positive and negative experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other related gender/sexual orientation identities (LGBTQ+) communication sciences and disorders (CSD) students, which were associated with their academic training to learn how to better support these students. Method: The climate survey comprised demographic questions, agreement statements, and open-ended responses. Four thematic types of agreement statements included the following: respect for LGBTQ+ individuals and other marginalized groups, restroom access, resource availability/awareness, and gender-affirming voice training. Results: Only two question responses received an average score of 4 ( agree ), suggesting an overall need for improvement in acceptance and support of LGBTQ+ CSD students. Additionally, students in discriminatory states had lower scores of agreement on questions related to respect, resources, and access to appropriate restrooms. Conclusion: CSD faculty need to improve the climate in CSD for acceptance, resources, and support for LGBTQ+ CSD students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_persp-25-00077
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The LGBTQ+ Communication Sciences and Disorders Student Association Climate Survey

Charles Lenell, Gregory C. Robinson, Kayla Howerton, Jonah Snapper
Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

The LGBTQ+ Communication Sciences and Disorders Student Association Climate Survey

Charles Lenell, Gregory C. Robinson, Kayla Howerton, Jonah Snapper
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the survey was to understand the positive and negative experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other related gender/sexual orientation identities (LGBTQ+) communication sciences and disorders (CSD) students, which were associated with their academic training to learn how to better support these students. Method: The climate survey comprised demographic questions, agreement statements, and open-ended responses. Four thematic types of agreement statements included the following: respect for LGBTQ+ individuals and other marginalized groups, restroom access, resource availability/awareness, and gender-affirming voice training. Results: Only two question responses received an average score of 4 ( agree ), suggesting an overall need for improvement in acceptance and support of LGBTQ+ CSD students. Additionally, students in discriminatory states had lower scores of agreement on questions related to respect, resources, and access to appropriate restrooms. Conclusion: CSD faculty need to improve the climate in CSD for acceptance, resources, and support for LGBTQ+ CSD students.

Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
Sacred Heart University (US), University of Northern Colorado (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.