Assessment of Mid-Calf Protective Footwear for Firefighters: Comfort, Functionality, and Style in Relation to Foot Structure

Background: This study evaluated the relationship between the comfort, functionality, and design features of firefighting footwear and foot structure in a cohort of 100 firefighters aged 25–40 years. Methods: Foot structure was assessed using a CQ-ST podoscope. Subjective ratings of perceived comfort, functionality, and style of mid-calf leather firefighting boots (Model C) were collected. Statistical analysis was conducted using Spearman’s rank correlation. Results: Statistically significant correlations were found between foot width and perceived shoe length comfort (R = 0.21, p = 0.037; R = 0.24; p = 0.017). Clarke’s angle was negatively correlated with the heel cushioning (R = −0.21; p = 0.035; R = −0.23; p = 0.023), forefoot cushioning (R = −0.24, p = 0.015; R = −0.27, p = 0.006), overall comfort (R = −0.22, p = 0.029) as well as with grip (R = −0.23, p = 0.021; R = −0.27, p = 0.006), individualization (R = −0.21, p = 0.035; R = −0.24, p = 0.015) and style (R = −0.21, p = 0.036; R = −0.24, p = 0.016). The β angle was negatively correlated with shoe forefoot width (R = −0.22, p = 0.024) and breathability (R = −0.22, p = 0.028), whereas the γ angle was negatively correlated with ease of donning and doffing (R = −0.21, p = 0.037). Conclusions: Firefighters with wider feet reported higher footwear comfort ratings regarding shoe length. In contrast, those with a higher longitudinal foot arch reported lower ratings of heel and forefoot cushioning, as well as overall comfort. A higher longitudinal foot arch was also associated with lower ratings of grip, individualization, and style, whereas greater varus deviation of the right fifth toe was associated with poorer breathability ratings. Perceived comfort was closely associated with more positive evaluations of both the functional and aesthetic aspects of the boots, underscoring its importance in overall footwear acceptance. These suggest that individual foot morphology should be considered in the design and selection of firefighting footwear, as a more personalized fit may improve comfort, usability, and potentially reduce the risk of foot discomfort and overuse-related musculoskeletal disorders during occupational activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16168116
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Mid-Calf Protective Footwear for Firefighters: Comfort, Functionality, and Style in Relation to Foot Structure

Ewa Puszczałowska-Lizis, Sabina Lizis, Jarosław Omorczyk, Andzelika Ziemianska
Applied Sciences
Occupational Health and Performance
article

Assessment of Mid-Calf Protective Footwear for Firefighters: Comfort, Functionality, and Style in Relation to Foot Structure

Ewa Puszczałowska-Lizis, Sabina Lizis, Jarosław Omorczyk, Andzelika Ziemianska
article en

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the relationship between the comfort, functionality, and design features of firefighting footwear and foot structure in a cohort of 100 firefighters aged 25–40 years. Methods: Foot structure was assessed using a CQ-ST podoscope. Subjective ratings of perceived comfort, functionality, and style of mid-calf leather firefighting boots (Model C) were collected. Statistical analysis was conducted using Spearman’s rank correlation. Results: Statistically significant correlations were found between foot width and perceived shoe length comfort (R = 0.21, p = 0.037; R = 0.24; p = 0.017). Clarke’s angle was negatively correlated with the heel cushioning (R = −0.21; p = 0.035; R = −0.23; p = 0.023), forefoot cushioning (R = −0.24, p = 0.015; R = −0.27, p = 0.006), overall comfort (R = −0.22, p = 0.029) as well as with grip (R = −0.23, p = 0.021; R = −0.27, p = 0.006), individualization (R = −0.21, p = 0.035; R = −0.24, p = 0.015) and style (R = −0.21, p = 0.036; R = −0.24, p = 0.016). The β angle was negatively correlated with shoe forefoot width (R = −0.22, p = 0.024) and breathability (R = −0.22, p = 0.028), whereas the γ angle was negatively correlated with ease of donning and doffing (R = −0.21, p = 0.037). Conclusions: Firefighters with wider feet reported higher footwear comfort ratings regarding shoe length. In contrast, those with a higher longitudinal foot arch reported lower ratings of heel and forefoot cushioning, as well as overall comfort. A higher longitudinal foot arch was also associated with lower ratings of grip, individualization, and style, whereas greater varus deviation of the right fifth toe was associated with poorer breathability ratings. Perceived comfort was closely associated with more positive evaluations of both the functional and aesthetic aspects of the boots, underscoring its importance in overall footwear acceptance. These suggest that individual foot morphology should be considered in the design and selection of firefighting footwear, as a more personalized fit may improve comfort, usability, and potentially reduce the risk of foot discomfort and overuse-related musculoskeletal disorders during occupational activities.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(16)
Medical University of Silesia (PL), University School of Physical Education in Kraków (PL), John Paul II Hospital (PL), University of Rzeszów (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.